From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, kuniyu@amazon.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v8 04/10] tcp: directly drop skb in cookie check for ipv6
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 19:29:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222113003.67558-5-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222113003.67558-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Like previous patch does, only moving skb drop logical code to
cookie_v6_check() for later refinement.
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
--
v8
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89iL8M=1vFdZ1hBb4POuz+MKQ50fmBAewfbowEH3jpEtpZQ@mail.gmail.com/
1. add reviewed-by tag (Eric)
v7:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240219043815.98410-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/
1. refine the code (by removing redundant check), no functional changes. (Kuniyuki)
v6
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c987d2c79e4a4655166eb8eafef473384edb37fb.camel@redhat.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL+tcoAgSjwsmFnDh_Gs9ZgMi-y5awtVx+4VhJPNRADjo7LLSA@mail.gmail.com/
1. take one case into consideration, behave like old days, or else it will trigger errors.
v5
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89iKz7=1q7e8KY57Dn3ED7O=RCOfLxoHQKO4eNXnZa1OPWg@mail.gmail.com/
1. avoid duplication of these opt_skb tests/actions (Eric)
---
net/ipv6/syncookies.c | 4 ++++
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 5 +----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
index 6b9c69278819..ea0d9954a29f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct sock *ret = sk;
__u8 rcv_wscale;
int full_space;
+ SKB_DR(reason);
if (!READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_syncookies) ||
!th->ack || th->rst)
@@ -256,10 +257,13 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
ireq->ecn_ok &= cookie_ecn_ok(net, dst);
ret = tcp_get_cookie_sock(sk, skb, req, dst);
+ if (!ret)
+ goto out_drop;
out:
return ret;
out_free:
reqsk_free(req);
out_drop:
+ kfree_skb_reason(skb, reason);
return NULL;
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index 57b25b1fc9d9..0c180bb8187f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -1653,11 +1653,8 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
struct sock *nsk = tcp_v6_cookie_check(sk, skb);
- if (!nsk)
- goto discard;
-
if (nsk != sk) {
- if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb))
+ if (nsk && tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb))
goto reset;
if (opt_skb)
__kfree_skb(opt_skb);
--
2.37.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-22 11:29 [PATCH net-next v8 00/10] introduce drop reasons for tcp receive path Jason Xing
2024-02-22 11:29 ` [PATCH net-next v8 01/10] tcp: add a dropreason definitions and prepare for cookie check Jason Xing
2024-02-22 11:29 ` [PATCH net-next v8 02/10] tcp: directly drop skb in cookie check for ipv4 Jason Xing
2024-02-22 11:29 ` [PATCH net-next v8 03/10] tcp: use drop reasons " Jason Xing
2024-02-22 12:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-22 11:29 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2024-02-22 11:29 ` [PATCH net-next v8 05/10] tcp: use drop reasons in cookie check for ipv6 Jason Xing
2024-02-22 11:29 ` [PATCH net-next v8 06/10] tcp: introduce dropreasons in receive path Jason Xing
2024-02-22 12:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-22 11:30 ` [PATCH net-next v8 07/10] tcp: add more specific possible drop reasons in tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process() Jason Xing
2024-02-22 11:30 ` [PATCH net-next v8 08/10] tcp: add dropreasons in tcp_rcv_state_process() Jason Xing
2024-02-22 17:28 ` David Ahern
2024-02-22 18:11 ` Jason Xing
2024-02-22 11:30 ` [PATCH net-next v8 09/10] tcp: make the dropreason really work when calling tcp_rcv_state_process() Jason Xing
2024-02-22 11:30 ` [PATCH net-next v8 10/10] tcp: make dropreason in tcp_child_process() work Jason Xing
2024-02-22 12:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-22 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next v8 00/10] introduce drop reasons for tcp receive path David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240222113003.67558-5-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.