All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] ACPI: scan: Make acpi_processor_add() check the device enabled bit
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:47:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222184738.00000bf7@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3298279.44csPzL39Z@kreacher>

On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:03:17 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Modify acpi_processor_add() return an error if _STA returns the enabled
> bit clear for the given processor device, so as to avoid using processors
> that don't decode their resources, as per the ACPI specification. [1]
> 
> Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/06_Device_Configuration.html#sta-device-status # [1]
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This does the job for us so if you are happier with this approach
that works for me.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |    3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -381,6 +381,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acp
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	int result = 0;
>  
> +	if (!acpi_device_is_enabled(device))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	pr = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_processor), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!pr)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2024-02-22 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21 19:59 [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: scan: Check enabled _STA bit on Bus/Device Checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-21 20:01 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] ACPI: scan: Fix device check notification handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-22 18:50   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-21 20:01 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] ACPI: scan: Relocate acpi_bus_trim_one() Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-22 17:09   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-21 20:02 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] ACPI: scan: Rework Device Check and Bus Check notification handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-22 18:28   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-26 15:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 15:54       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-21 20:03 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] ACPI: scan: Make acpi_processor_add() check the device enabled bit Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-22 18:47   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240222184738.00000bf7@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.