Re: [PATCH 2/2] pidfd: add pidfdfs

[Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 02:27:23PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > So you are basically saying that for now it is ok to break everybody's
> > system who tries linux-next and let them bisect, just to figure out they
> > have to disable a config option?
> 
> Let me fix that suggestive phrasing for you. You seem to struggle a bit:

Thanks for helping!

> > I think we should flip the default because this is breaking people who
> > are trying linux-next and making them bisect which can be annoying.
> 
> Yes, that was the intent. I probably should've made that clear. What I
> was trying to do is to flip the default to N and fix the policy. When
> that is done we should aim to flip back to y.

Ok, thanks.