All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 09:26:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240223172646.GW616564@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240223071506.3968029-11-hch@lst.de>

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 08:15:06AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Commit aff3a9edb708 ("xfs: Use preallocation for inodes with extsz
> hints") disabled delayed allocation for all inodes with extent size
> hints due a data exposure problem.  It turns out we fixed this data
> exposure problem since by always creating unwritten extents for
> delalloc conversions due to more data exposure problems, but the
> writeback path doesn't actually support extent size hints when
> converting delalloc these days, which probably isn't a problem given
> that people using the hints know what they get.
> 
> However due to the way how xfs_get_extsz_hint is implemented, it
> always claims an extent size hint for RT inodes even if the RT
> extent size is a single FSB.  Due to that the above commit effectively
> disabled delalloc support for RT inodes.
> 
> Switch xfs_get_extsz_hint to return 0 for this case and work around
> that in a few places to reinstate delalloc support for RT inodes on
> file systems with an sb_rextsize of 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Woot!
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c   | 3 ++-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c   | 2 --
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c    | 2 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 2 ++
>  4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 37ec247edc1332..9e12278d1b62cd 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ xfs_get_extsz_hint(
>  		return 0;
>  	if ((ip->i_diflags & XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSIZE) && ip->i_extsize)
>  		return ip->i_extsize;
> -	if (XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip))
> +	if (XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip) &&
> +	    ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_rextsize > 1)
>  		return ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_rextsize;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index e6abe56d1f1f23..aea4e29ebd6785 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -992,8 +992,6 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
>  		return xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(inode, offset, count,
>  				flags, iomap, srcmap);
>  
> -	ASSERT(!XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip));
> -
>  	error = xfs_qm_dqattach(ip);
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> index be102fd49560dc..ca60ba060fd5c9 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ xfs_stat_blksize(
>  	 * always return the realtime extent size.
>  	 */
>  	if (XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip))
> -		return XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip));
> +		return XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip) ? : 1);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Allow large block sizes to be reported to userspace programs if the
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> index 2f85567f3d756b..9c7fba175b9025 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> @@ -1340,6 +1340,8 @@ xfs_bmap_rtalloc(
>  	int			error;
>  
>  	align = xfs_get_extsz_hint(ap->ip);
> +	if (!align)
> +		align = 1;
>  retry:
>  	error = xfs_bmap_extsize_align(mp, &ap->got, &ap->prev,
>  					align, 1, ap->eof, 0,
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-23 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-23  7:14 bring back RT delalloc support v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23  7:14 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:29   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:14 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 16:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:46       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 16:49         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:30           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:14 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 16:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:09   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:28       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:15     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:29       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23 17:30         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:25   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-23  7:15 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-23 17:26   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-26 10:04 bring back RT delalloc support v3 Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-26 10:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240223172646.GW616564@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.