All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: scan: Consolidate Device Check and Bus Check notification handling
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:41:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240227094131.0000291c@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7632957.EvYhyI6sBW@kreacher>

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:46:41 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> There is no particular reason why device object subtree rescans in
> acpi_scan_device_check() and acpi_scan_device_check() should be carried
> out differently, so move the rescan code into a new function called
> acpi_scan_rescan_bus() and make both the functions above invoke it.
> 
> While at it, in the Device Check case, start the device object subtree
> rescan mentioned above from the target device's parent, as per the
> specification. [1]
> 
> Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#device-object-notification-values # [1]
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Thanks,

Jonathan

      reply	other threads:[~2024-02-27  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-26 16:24 [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI: scan: Check enabled _STA bit on Bus/Device Checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: scan: Fix device check notification handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ACPI: scan: Relocate acpi_bus_trim_one() Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:49   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI: scan: Make acpi_processor_add() check the device enabled bit Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27  9:28   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-27 11:13     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI: scan: Rework Device Check and Bus Check notification handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27  9:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-26 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: scan: Consolidate " Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27  9:41   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240227094131.0000291c@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.