From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>, Max Zhen <max.zhen@amd.com>,
Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@amd.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:55:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240229115538.7d2f5a35@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229083953.607569-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Hi All,
I did a mistake in this series.
As noted by Nuno, the device.h include is missing in patch 2 and so
the patch 2 doesn't compile :(
A v3 is already sent fixing my missing device.h mistake.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240229105204.720717-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com/
Sorry for this error.
Best regards,
Hervé
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:39:40 +0100
Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the following sequence:
> of_platform_depopulate(); /* Remove devices from a DT overlay node */
> of_overlay_remove(); /* Remove the DT overlay node itself */
>
> Some warnings are raised by __of_changeset_entry_destroy() which was
> called from of_overlay_remove():
> ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2 ...
>
> The issue is that, during the device devlink removals triggered from the
> of_platform_depopulate(), jobs are put in a workqueue.
> These jobs drop the reference to the devices. When a device is no more
> referenced (refcount == 0), it is released and the reference to its
> of_node is dropped by a call to of_node_put().
> These operations are fully correct except that, because of the
> workqueue, they are done asynchronously with respect to function calls.
>
> In the sequence provided, the jobs are run too late, after the call to
> __of_changeset_entry_destroy() and so a missing of_node_put() call is
> detected by __of_changeset_entry_destroy().
>
> This series fixes this issue introducing device_link_wait_removal() in
> order to wait for the end of jobs execution (patch 1) and using this
> function to synchronize the overlay removal with the end of jobs
> execution (patch 2).
>
> Compared to the previous iteration:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20231130174126.688486-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com/
> this v2 series mainly:
> - Renames the workqueue used.
> - Calls device_link_wait_removal() a bit later to handle cases reported
> by Luca [1] and Nuno [2].
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231220181627.341e8789@booty/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240205-fix-device-links-overlays-v2-2-5344f8c79d57@analog.com/
>
> Best regards,
> Hervé
>
> Changes v1 -> v2
> - Patch 1
> Rename the workqueue to 'device_link_wq'
> Add 'Fixes' tag and Cc stable
>
> - Patch 2
> Add device.h inclusion.
> Call device_link_wait_removal() later in the overlay removal
> sequence (i.e. in free_overlay_changeset() function).
> Drop of_mutex lock while calling device_link_wait_removal().
> Add 'Fixes' tag and Cc stable
>
> Herve Codina (2):
> driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal()
> of: overlay: Synchronize of_overlay_remove() with the devlink removals
>
> drivers/base/core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/of/overlay.c | 9 ++++++++-
> include/linux/device.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-29 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-29 8:39 [PATCH v2 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-02-29 8:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal() Herve Codina
2024-02-29 9:43 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-29 8:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] of: overlay: Synchronize of_overlay_remove() with the devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-02-29 9:47 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-29 9:50 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-29 10:14 ` Herve Codina
2024-02-29 10:25 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-29 10:55 ` Herve Codina [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240229115538.7d2f5a35@bootlin.com \
--to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=max.zhen@amd.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sonal.santan@amd.com \
--cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.