From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com,
andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com, richardcochran@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bnxt_en: Introduce devlink runtime driver param to set ptp tx timeout
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:49:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240229174914.3a9cb61e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1d31561-f5b5-486f-98e4-75ccc2723131@linux.dev>
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:22:19 +0000 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> > Perhaps, but also I think it's fairly impractical. Specialized users may
> > be able to tune this, but in DC environment PTP is handled at the host
>
> That's correct, only 1 app is actually doing syncronization
>
> > level, and the applications come and go. So all the poor admin can do
>
> Container/VM level applications don't care about PTP packets timestamps.
> They only care about the time being synchronized.
What I was saying is that in the PTP daemon you don't know whether
the app running is likely to cause delays or not, and how long.
> > is set this to the max value. While in the driver you can actually try
>
> Pure admin will tune it according to the host level app configuration
> which may differ because of environment.
Concrete example?
> > to be a bit more intelligent. Expecting the user to tune this strikes me
> > as trying to take the easy way out..
>
> There is no actual way for application to signal down to driver that it
> gave up waiting for TX timestamp, what other kind of smartness can we
> expect here?
Let's figure out why the timeouts happen, before we create uAPIs.
If it's because there's buffer bloat or a pause storm, the next TS
request that gets queued will get stuck in the same exact way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-01 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-29 7:02 [PATCH net-next 0/2] bnxt_en: Support configurable PTP TX timeout Michael Chan
2024-02-29 7:02 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] bnxt_en: Introduce devlink runtime driver param to set ptp tx timeout Michael Chan
2024-02-29 9:27 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-02-29 17:11 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-29 17:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-29 21:22 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-03-01 1:49 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-03-01 7:39 ` Pavan Chebbi
2024-03-01 17:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-07 3:50 ` Pavan Chebbi
2024-03-07 4:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-01 11:34 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-29 7:02 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] bnxt_en: Retry for TX timestamp from FW until timeout specified Michael Chan
2024-02-29 9:23 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2024-02-29 16:43 ` Michael Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240229174914.3a9cb61e@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.