All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 06/21] rxrpc: Remove atomic handling on some fields only used in I/O thread
Date: Fri,  1 Mar 2024 16:37:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240301163807.385573-7-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240301163807.385573-1-dhowells@redhat.com>

call->tx_transmitted and call->acks_prev_seq don't need to be managed with
cmpxchg() and barriers as it's only used within the singular I/O thread.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 net/rxrpc/call_event.c | 10 ++++------
 net/rxrpc/output.c     |  8 +++-----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
index 84eedbb49fcb..1184518dcdb8 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ void rxrpc_resend(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *ack_skb)
 	struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp;
 	struct rxrpc_txbuf *txb;
 	unsigned long resend_at;
-	rxrpc_seq_t transmitted = READ_ONCE(call->tx_transmitted);
+	rxrpc_seq_t transmitted = call->tx_transmitted;
 	ktime_t now, max_age, oldest, ack_ts;
 	bool unacked = false;
 	unsigned int i;
@@ -184,16 +184,14 @@ void rxrpc_resend(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *ack_skb)
 	 * seen.  Anything between the soft-ACK table and that point will get
 	 * ACK'd or NACK'd in due course, so don't worry about it here; here we
 	 * need to consider retransmitting anything beyond that point.
-	 *
-	 * Note that ACK for a packet can beat the update of tx_transmitted.
 	 */
-	if (after_eq(READ_ONCE(call->acks_prev_seq), READ_ONCE(call->tx_transmitted)))
+	if (after_eq(call->acks_prev_seq, call->tx_transmitted))
 		goto no_further_resend;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_from(txb, &call->tx_buffer, call_link) {
-		if (before_eq(txb->seq, READ_ONCE(call->acks_prev_seq)))
+		if (before_eq(txb->seq, call->acks_prev_seq))
 			continue;
-		if (after(txb->seq, READ_ONCE(call->tx_transmitted)))
+		if (after(txb->seq, call->tx_transmitted))
 			break; /* Not transmitted yet */
 
 		if (ack && ack->reason == RXRPC_ACK_PING_RESPONSE &&
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/output.c b/net/rxrpc/output.c
index 2386b01b2231..1e039b6f4494 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/output.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/output.c
@@ -397,12 +397,10 @@ int rxrpc_send_data_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct rxrpc_txbuf *txb)
 
 	/* Track what we've attempted to transmit at least once so that the
 	 * retransmission algorithm doesn't try to resend what we haven't sent
-	 * yet.  However, this can race as we can receive an ACK before we get
-	 * to this point.  But, OTOH, if we won't get an ACK mentioning this
-	 * packet unless the far side received it (though it could have
-	 * discarded it anyway and NAK'd it).
+	 * yet.
 	 */
-	cmpxchg(&call->tx_transmitted, txb->seq - 1, txb->seq);
+	if (txb->seq == call->tx_transmitted + 1)
+		call->tx_transmitted = txb->seq;
 
 	/* send the packet with the don't fragment bit set if we currently
 	 * think it's small enough */


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-01 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-01 16:37 [PATCH net-next 00/21] rxrpc: Miscellaneous changes and make use of MSG_SPLICE_PAGES David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 01/21] rxrpc: Record the Tx serial in the rxrpc_txbuf and retransmit trace David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 02/21] rxrpc: Convert rxrpc_txbuf::flags into a mask and don't use atomics David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 03/21] rxrpc: Note cksum in txbuf David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 04/21] rxrpc: Fix the names of the fields in the ACK trailer struct David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 05/21] rxrpc: Strip barriers and atomics off of timer tracking David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` David Howells [this message]
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 07/21] rxrpc: Do lazy DF flag resetting David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 08/21] rxrpc: Merge together DF/non-DF branches of data Tx function David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 09/21] rxrpc: Add a kvec[] to the rxrpc_txbuf struct David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 10/21] rxrpc: Split up the DATA packet transmission function David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 11/21] rxrpc: Don't pick values out of the wire header when setting up security David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 12/21] rxrpc: Move rxrpc_send_ACK() to output.c with rxrpc_send_ack_packet() David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 13/21] rxrpc: Use rxrpc_txbuf::kvec[0] instead of rxrpc_txbuf::wire David Howells
2024-03-03  5:26   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 14/21] rxrpc: Do zerocopy using MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and page frags David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 15/21] rxrpc: Parse received packets before dealing with timeouts David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 16/21] rxrpc: Don't permit resending after all Tx packets acked David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 17/21] rxrpc: Differentiate PING ACK transmission traces David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 18/21] rxrpc: Use ktimes for call timeout tracking and set the timer lazily David Howells
2024-03-03  5:27   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-03 23:58     ` David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 19/21] rxrpc: Record probes after transmission and reduce number of time-gets David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 20/21] rxrpc: Clean up the resend algorithm David Howells
2024-03-01 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next 21/21] rxrpc: Extract useful fields from a received ACK to skb priv data David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240301163807.385573-7-dhowells@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.