All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, void@manifault.com,
	sinquersw@gmail.com, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/15] libbpf: type suffixes and autocreate flag for struct_ops maps
Date: Sat,  2 Mar 2024 03:19:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240302011920.15302-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)

Tweak struct_ops related APIs to allow the following features:
- specify version suffixes for stuct_ops map types;
- share same BPF program between several map definitions with
  different local BTF types, assuming only maps with same
  kernel BTF type would be selected for load;
- toggle autocreate flag for struct_ops maps;
- automatically toggle autoload for struct_ops programs referenced
  from struct_ops maps, depending on autocreate status of the
  corresponding map;
- use SEC("?.struct_ops") and SEC("?.struct_ops.link")
  to define struct_ops maps with autocreate == false after object open.

This would allow loading programs like below:

    SEC("struct_ops/foo") int BPF_PROG(foo) { ... }
    SEC("struct_ops/bar") int BPF_PROG(bar) { ... }

    struct bpf_testmod_ops___v1 {
        int (*foo)(void);
    };

    struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 {
        int (*foo)(void);
        int (*bar)(void);
    };

    /* Assume kernel type name to be 'test_ops' */
    SEC(".struct_ops.link")
    struct test_ops___v1 map_v1 = {
        /* Program 'foo' shared by maps with
         * different local BTF type
         */
        .foo = (void *)foo
    };

    SEC(".struct_ops.link")
    struct test_ops___v2 map_v2 = {
        .foo = (void *)foo,
        .bar = (void *)bar
    };

Assuming the following tweaks are done before loading:

    /* to load v1 */
    bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_v1, true);
    bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_v2, false);

    /* to load v2 */
    bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_v1, false);
    bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_v2, true);

Patch #8 ties autocreate and autoload flags for struct_ops maps and
programs. While discussion for v1 concluded that such feature is
useful, it is an outlier compared to the rest of libbpf API that
treats autoload / autocreate flags in most simple way possible.
An alternative might be a dedicated API call, e.g.:

  int bpf_object__infer_struct_ops_progs_autoload(struct bpf_object *)
  
That would set programs autoload flags depending on user defined state
of autocreate flags of struct_ops map.

It might even be accompanied by an API call:

  int bpf_object__infer_struct_ops_maps_autocreate(struct bpf_object *)

That would check which struct_ops maps definitions could be loaded
with current kernel, or report error if there are ambiguities.

Changelog:
- v1 [1] -> v2:
  - fixed memory leak in patch #1 (Kui-Feng);
  - improved error messages in patch #2 (Martin, Andrii);
  - in bad_struct_ops selftest from patch #6 added .test_2
    map member setup (David);
  - added utility functions to capture libbpf log from selftests (David)
  - in selftests replaced usage of ...__open_and_load by separate
    calls to ..._open() and ..._load() (Andrii);
  - removed serial_... in selftest definitions (Andrii);
  - improved comments in selftest struct_ops_autocreate
    from patch #7 (David);
  - removed autoload toggling logic incompatible with shadow variables
    from bpf_map__set_autocreate(), instead struct_ops programs
    autoload property is computed at struct_ops maps load phase,
    see patch #8 (Kui-Feng, Martin, Andrii);
  - added support for SEC("?.struct_ops") and SEC("?.struct_ops.link")
    (Andrii).

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240227204556.17524-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/

Eduard Zingerman (15):
  libbpf: allow version suffixes (___smth) for struct_ops types
  libbpf: tie struct_ops programs to kernel BTF ids, not to local ids
  libbpf: honor autocreate flag for struct_ops maps
  selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix
  selftests/bpf: utility functions to capture libbpf log in test_progs
  selftests/bpf: bad_struct_ops test
  selftests/bpf: test autocreate behavior for struct_ops maps
  libbpf: sync progs autoload with maps autocreate for struct_ops maps
  selftests/bpf: verify struct_ops autoload/autocreate sync
  libbpf: replace elf_state->st_ops_* fields with SEC_ST_OPS sec_type
  libbpf: struct_ops in SEC("?.struct_ops") and SEC("?.struct_ops.link")
  libbpf: rewrite btf datasec names starting from '?'
  selftests/bpf: test case for SEC("?.struct_ops")
  bpf: allow '?' at the beginning of DATASEC names
  selftests/bpf: test cases for '?' in BTF names

 kernel/bpf/btf.c                              |  17 +-
 tools/lib/bpf/features.c                      |  22 +++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        | 174 ++++++++++++------
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h               |   2 +
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   |  25 +++
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h   |   4 +
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c |  67 +++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c  |  46 +++++
 .../bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c    | 124 +++++++++++++
 .../bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c   |  33 +++-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops.c      |  25 +++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops2.c     |  14 ++
 .../bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c         |  52 ++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c   |  21 ++-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c      |  57 ++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h      |   3 +
 16 files changed, 614 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bad_struct_ops.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/struct_ops_autocreate.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bad_struct_ops2.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_autocreate.c

-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-03-02  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-02  1:19 Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/15] libbpf: allow version suffixes (___smth) for struct_ops types Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/15] libbpf: tie struct_ops programs to kernel BTF ids, not to local ids Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/15] libbpf: honor autocreate flag for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/15] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops map definition with type suffix Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/15] selftests/bpf: utility functions to capture libbpf log in test_progs Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/15] selftests/bpf: bad_struct_ops test Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/15] selftests/bpf: test autocreate behavior for struct_ops maps Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/15] libbpf: sync progs autoload with maps autocreate " Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-04 19:13   ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/15] selftests/bpf: verify struct_ops autoload/autocreate sync Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/15] libbpf: replace elf_state->st_ops_* fields with SEC_ST_OPS sec_type Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/15] libbpf: struct_ops in SEC("?.struct_ops") and SEC("?.struct_ops.link") Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/15] libbpf: rewrite btf datasec names starting from '?' Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/15] selftests/bpf: test case for SEC("?.struct_ops") Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/15] bpf: allow '?' at the beginning of DATASEC names Eduard Zingerman
2024-03-02  1:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/15] selftests/bpf: test cases for '?' in BTF names Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240302011920.15302-1-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.