All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kbusch@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH pci-next] pci/edr: Ignore Surprise Down error on hot removal
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:58:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240304115844.GA3541@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304090819.3812465-1-haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 04:08:19AM -0500, Ethan Zhao wrote:
> Per PCI firmware spec r3.3 sec 4.6.12, for firmware first mode DPC
> handling path, FW should clear UC errors logged by port and bring link
> out of DPC, but because of ambiguity of wording in the spec, some BIOSes
> doesn't clear the surprise down error and the error bits in pci status,
> still notify OS to handle it. thus following trick is needed in EDR when
> double reporting (hot removal interrupt && dpc notification) is hit.

Please provide more detailed information about the hardware and BIOS
affected by this.


> -static void dpc_handle_surprise_removal(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +bool  dpc_handle_surprise_removal(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
> +	if (!dpc_is_surprise_removal(pdev))
> +		return false;

This change of moving dpc_is_surprise_removal() into
dpc_handle_surprise_removal() seems unrelated to the problem at hand.

Please drop it if it's unnecessary to fix the issue.


> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/edr.c
> @@ -184,6 +184,9 @@ static void edr_handle_event(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
>  		goto send_ost;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (dpc_handle_surprise_removal(edev))
> +		goto send_ost;
> +
>  	dpc_process_error(edev);
>  	pci_aer_raw_clear_status(edev);

This seems to be the only necessary change.  Please reduce the
patch to contain only it and no other refactoring.

Please capitalize the "PCI/EDR: " prefix in the subject and add
a Fixes tag.

Thanks,

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-04 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-04  9:08 [PATCH pci-next] pci/edr: Ignore Surprise Down error on hot removal Ethan Zhao
2024-03-04 11:58 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2024-03-04 19:33   ` Smita Koralahalli
2024-03-05  2:19     ` Ethan Zhao
2024-03-05  2:09   ` Ethan Zhao
2024-03-05  9:21     ` Lukas Wunner
2024-03-06  1:37       ` Ethan Zhao
2024-03-04 20:10 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-03-05  2:29   ` Ethan Zhao
2024-03-05  4:04     ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-03-05  5:49       ` Ethan Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240304115844.GA3541@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.