All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ryan.roberts@arm.com,mgorman@suse.de,david@redhat.com,willy@infradead.org,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-free-folios-in-a-batch-in-shrink_folio_list.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:02:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240305010251.EA4B8C433F1@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm: free folios in a batch in shrink_folio_list()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-free-folios-in-a-batch-in-shrink_folio_list.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: mm: free folios in a batch in shrink_folio_list()
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:42:45 +0000

Use free_unref_page_batch() to free the folios.  This may increase the
number of IPIs from calling try_to_unmap_flush() more often, but that's
going to be very workload-dependent.  It may even reduce the number of
IPIs as we now batch-free large folios instead of freeing them one at a
time.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-12-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/vmscan.c |   20 +++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-free-folios-in-a-batch-in-shrink_folio_list
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1006,14 +1006,15 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(st
 		struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc,
 		struct reclaim_stat *stat, bool ignore_references)
 {
+	struct folio_batch free_folios;
 	LIST_HEAD(ret_folios);
-	LIST_HEAD(free_folios);
 	LIST_HEAD(demote_folios);
 	unsigned int nr_reclaimed = 0;
 	unsigned int pgactivate = 0;
 	bool do_demote_pass;
 	struct swap_iocb *plug = NULL;
 
+	folio_batch_init(&free_folios);
 	memset(stat, 0, sizeof(*stat));
 	cond_resched();
 	do_demote_pass = can_demote(pgdat->node_id, sc);
@@ -1412,14 +1413,11 @@ free_it:
 		 */
 		nr_reclaimed += nr_pages;
 
-		/*
-		 * Is there need to periodically free_folio_list? It would
-		 * appear not as the counts should be low
-		 */
-		if (unlikely(folio_test_large(folio)))
-			destroy_large_folio(folio);
-		else
-			list_add(&folio->lru, &free_folios);
+		if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) {
+			mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);
+			try_to_unmap_flush();
+			free_unref_folios(&free_folios);
+		}
 		continue;
 
 activate_locked_split:
@@ -1483,9 +1481,9 @@ keep:
 
 	pgactivate = stat->nr_activate[0] + stat->nr_activate[1];
 
-	mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(&free_folios);
+	mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);
 	try_to_unmap_flush();
-	free_unref_page_list(&free_folios);
+	free_unref_folios(&free_folios);
 
 	list_splice(&ret_folios, folio_list);
 	count_vm_events(PGACTIVATE, pgactivate);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from willy@infradead.org are

mm-separate-out-folio_flags-from-pageflags.patch
mm-remove-pagewaiters-pagesetwaiters-and-pageclearwaiters.patch
mm-remove-pageyoung-and-pageidle-definitions.patch
mm-add-__dump_folio.patch
mm-add-__dump_folio-fix.patch
mm-add-__dump_folio-fix-2.patch
mm-add-__dump_folio-fix-3.patch
mm-make-dump_page-take-a-const-argument.patch
mm-constify-testing-page-folio-flags.patch
mm-constify-more-page-folio-tests.patch
mm-remove-cast-from-page_to_nid.patch
mm-mempolicy-use-a-folio-in-do_mbind.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2024-03-05  1:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240305010251.EA4B8C433F1@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.