All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	"David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, macro@orcam.me.uk, ajayagarwal@google.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
	johan+linaro@kernel.org, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	treding@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, kthota@nvidia.com,
	mmaddireddy@nvidia.com, sagar.tv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] PCI/ASPM: Update saved buffers with latest ASPM
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 16:03:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240305220342.GA552530@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222174436.3565146-1-vidyas@nvidia.com>

[+to Sathy, David in case you want to update your Reviewed-by]

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 11:14:36PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> Many PCIe device drivers save the configuration state of their respective
> devices during probe and restore the same when their 'slot_reset' hook
> is called through PCIe Error Recovery Handler.
> 
> If the system has a change in ASPM policy after the driver's probe is
> called and before error event occurred, 'slot_reset' hook restores the
> PCIe configuration state to what it was at the time of probe but not to
> what it was just before the occurrence of the error event.
> This effectively leads to a mismatch in the ASPM configuration between
> the device and its upstream parent device.
> 
> Update the saved configuration state of the device with the latest info
> whenever there is a change w.r.t ASPM policy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>

> -void pci_save_aspm_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +void pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *pdev);

I rebased this again on top of my pci/aspm updates to remove the need
for the rename above.

> +static void pci_save_aspm_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_cap_saved_state *save_state;
> +	u16 *cap;
> +
> +	if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
> +		return;
> +
> +	save_state = pci_find_saved_cap(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> +	if (!save_state)
> +		return;
> +
> +	cap = (u16 *)&save_state->cap.data[0];
> +	pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &cap[1]);

And I changed this part so it only updates the PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_ASPMC
bits, not the entire LNKCTL.

Updating the entire saved register probably wouldn't *break* anything,
but it could randomly hide other LNKCTL changes depending on whether
or not ASPM configuration was changed in the interim.  For example:

  - driver .probe() saves LNKCTL
  - LNKCTL changes some non-ASPMC thing via setpci or other mechanism
  - save_state updated via pcie_config_aspm_link()

A restore in .slot_reset() would restore different LNKCTL values for
the non-ASPMC change depending on whether pcie_config_aspm_link() was
used.

I applied it on pci/aspm for v6.9.  Please take a look and make sure
it still does what you need:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/commit/?h=aspm&id=a6315434436d587f70e489e6365c5b7e20176a71

Sathy and David, I didn't add your Reviewed-by because I didn't want
to presume that you were OK with my changes.  But I'd be more than
happy to add them if you take a look.

Bjorn

> +}
> +
>  void pci_aspm_get_l1ss(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	/* Read L1 PM substate capabilities */
>  	pdev->l1ss = pci_find_ext_capability(pdev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_L1SS);
>  }
>  
> -void pci_save_aspm_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +void pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct pci_cap_saved_state *save_state;
>  	u16 l1ss = pdev->l1ss;
> @@ -309,10 +325,12 @@ static void pcie_set_clkpm_nocheck(struct pcie_link_state *link, int enable)
>  	struct pci_bus *linkbus = link->pdev->subordinate;
>  	u32 val = enable ? PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CLKREQ_EN : 0;
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list)
> +	list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list) {
>  		pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL,
>  						   PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CLKREQ_EN,
>  						   val);
> +		pci_save_aspm_state(child);
> +	}
>  	link->clkpm_enabled = !!enable;
>  }
>  
> @@ -931,6 +949,12 @@ static void pcie_config_aspm_link(struct pcie_link_state *link, u32 state)
>  		pcie_config_aspm_dev(parent, upstream);
>  
>  	link->aspm_enabled = state;
> +
> +	/* Update latest ASPM configuration in saved context */
> +	pci_save_aspm_state(link->downstream);
> +	pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(link->downstream);
> +	pci_save_aspm_state(parent);
> +	pci_save_aspm_l1ss_state(parent);
>  }
>  
>  static void pcie_config_aspm_path(struct pcie_link_state *link)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-05 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-25 13:38 [PATCH V1] PCI/ASPM: Update saved buffers with latest ASPM configuration Vidya Sagar
2023-01-25 15:01 ` Wysocki, Rafael J
2023-01-25 17:22   ` Vidya Sagar
2023-01-26 11:43     ` Wysocki, Rafael J
2023-01-26 21:22 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-01-27 20:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-28 18:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-03 10:35 ` [PATCH V2] PCI/ASPM: Update saved buffers with latest ASPM Vidya Sagar
2024-01-03 15:37   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-01-08 12:42   ` [PATCH V3] " Vidya Sagar
2024-02-20  4:07     ` Vidya Sagar
2024-02-20 17:23     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-22 17:44     ` [PATCH V4] " Vidya Sagar
2024-02-22 18:20       ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-22 18:54         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-22 19:54           ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-22 22:14             ` David E. Box
2024-02-22 20:59         ` Vidya Sagar
2024-03-05 22:03       ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-03-05 22:35         ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-03-06  1:37         ` David E. Box
2024-03-07 22:01         ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240305220342.GA552530@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ajayagarwal@google.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kthota@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sagar.tv@gmail.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.