From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>, Max Zhen <max.zhen@amd.com>,
Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@amd.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal()
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:07:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240306120713.6d7b9344@booty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240306085007.169771-2-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:50:02 +0100
Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com> wrote:
> The commit 80dd33cf72d1 ("drivers: base: Fix device link removal")
> introduces a workqueue to release the consumer and supplier devices used
> in the devlink.
> In the job queued, devices are release and in turn, when all the
> references to these devices are dropped, the release function of the
> device itself is called.
>
> Nothing is present to provide some synchronisation with this workqueue
> in order to ensure that all ongoing releasing operations are done and
> so, some other operations can be started safely.
>
> For instance, in the following sequence:
> 1) of_platform_depopulate()
> 2) of_overlay_remove()
>
> During the step 1, devices are released and related devlinks are removed
> (jobs pushed in the workqueue).
> During the step 2, OF nodes are destroyed but, without any
> synchronisation with devlink removal jobs, of_overlay_remove() can raise
> warnings related to missing of_node_put():
> ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2
>
> Indeed, the missing of_node_put() call is going to be done, too late,
> from the workqueue job execution.
>
> Introduce device_link_wait_removal() to offer a way to synchronize
> operations waiting for the end of devlink removals (i.e. end of
> workqueue jobs).
> Also, as a flushing operation is done on the workqueue, the workqueue
> used is moved from a system-wide workqueue to a local one.
>
> Fixes: 80dd33cf72d1 ("drivers: base: Fix device link removal")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-06 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-06 8:50 [PATCH v4 0/2] Synchronize DT overlay removal with devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-03-06 8:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] driver core: Introduce device_link_wait_removal() Herve Codina
2024-03-06 9:20 ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 12:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 13:05 ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 13:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 14:11 ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 14:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 14:50 ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 15:01 ` Herve Codina
2024-03-06 15:13 ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 21:26 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-03-06 11:07 ` Luca Ceresoli [this message]
2024-03-06 12:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 15:24 ` Herve Codina
2024-03-06 15:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-06 21:14 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-03-06 8:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] of: dynamic: Synchronize of_changeset_destroy() with the devlink removals Herve Codina
2024-03-06 9:21 ` Nuno Sá
2024-03-06 11:07 ` Luca Ceresoli
2024-03-06 21:35 ` Saravana Kannan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240306120713.6d7b9344@booty \
--to=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
--cc=max.zhen@amd.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sonal.santan@amd.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.