All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	<ira.weiny@intel.com>, <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	<alison.schofield@intel.com>, <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cxl: Remove checking of iter in cxl_endpoint_get_perf_coordinates()
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 13:32:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240306133249.00006426@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229203040.755450-1-dave.jiang@intel.com>

On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:30:39 -0700
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:

> The while() loop in cxl_endpoint_get_perf_coordinates() checks to see if
> 'iter' is valid as part of the condition breaking out of the loop. However,
> iter is being used before the check at the end of the while loop before
> the next iteration starts. Given that the loop doesn't expect the iter to
> be NULL because it stops before the root port, remove the iter check.
> 
> The presence of the iter or removing the iter does not impact the behavior
> of the code. This is a code clean up and not a bug fix.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
> v2:
> - Add explanation of not a bug fix in commit log. (Dan)
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> index e59d9d37aa65..e1d30a885700 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> @@ -2142,7 +2142,7 @@ int cxl_endpoint_get_perf_coordinates(struct cxl_port *port,
>  	 * port each iteration. If the parent is cxl root then there is
>  	 * nothing to gather.
>  	 */
> -	while (iter && !is_cxl_root(to_cxl_port(iter->dev.parent))) {
> +	while (!is_cxl_root(to_cxl_port(iter->dev.parent))) {
>  		combine_coordinates(&c, &dport->sw_coord);
>  		c.write_latency += dport->link_latency;
>  		c.read_latency += dport->link_latency;


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-06 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-29 20:30 [PATCH v2 1/2] cxl: Remove checking of iter in cxl_endpoint_get_perf_coordinates() Dave Jiang
2024-02-29 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cxl: Add checks to access_coordinate calculation to fail missing data Dave Jiang
2024-03-06 13:32 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240306133249.00006426@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.