From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EA69DF55 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 06:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709792451; cv=none; b=UhnW6ck1JuBuQKUD+hzTFqPncqnGD3I1+VBXCD8EZEvESEpQzCW9DRqZkHIsIsTP2yY/xYumQmmqRO0omqvACaa14E8KXL8OByj6zZWxQeCm2Nb70OY+gQRspeNG5yRhOq5XvnAxncaJZrfJySivh044pm9+RDtxgT8fNrZ1ug0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709792451; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VdG4kbk7fTWWmYTN2b43PiGMDcz4M1EVWHfF9cc6Exw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Aui9FDEnJWB2tlD/WshfWwLj45fOlENYdT/wcSQeyRr/0hlO1vaIpI+PuofrBM4Y1ZMC9W7mbkZLZnI/ooMaclnAIgrDLqujLtT2MeDzVLTzy3QIvvC6CfpatvYhAVS/h1i8ofHkQRp/ZAFqxqYjjtkGjGQq/wQzqhcxI0+s0IU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hLZ+kKme; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hLZ+kKme" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709792449; x=1741328449; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=VdG4kbk7fTWWmYTN2b43PiGMDcz4M1EVWHfF9cc6Exw=; b=hLZ+kKmeILhYIt920ghUFLfilUuJdIS8RBdJnFjywv4S083nfvW1taCs OqFb58KfchP/78nZ9UOhenm33Mi6FK9ajZpOaFxcabFRO924D1ktqThxs rHs/HsUcMkjFZfA5dZbpyjGeju6coQ5WoC7vHu3e/2pCzsJ3bAHAmVJLz gYZp3xctXyHfZFXYA+5uUFqM+jdmS3MsxF9ZeFiYgFJVbTNd6PSFipn8h P3udzpkmSgGW186KuXjRMDftdUZbetv/JF3ubxj+UWIdroHmw41fkwmlt m+jCeOg4bLydd3DA1O3uP/jv94cCqb4LgvUFWWahY4wncSrcSbhBgaNeY Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11005"; a="15092013" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,210,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="15092013" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Mar 2024 22:20:47 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,210,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="14665974" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2024 22:20:47 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ri77U-0004tL-0x; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 06:20:44 +0000 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 14:20:41 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Christian Loehle Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Introduce per-task io util boost Message-ID: <202403071415.olRuAaBL-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240304201625.100619-2-christian.loehle@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240304201625.100619-2-christian.loehle@arm.com> Hi Christian, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tip/sched/core] [also build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next peterz-queue/sched/core linus/master v6.8-rc7 next-20240306] [cannot apply to rafael-pm/acpi-bus rafael-pm/devprop] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Loehle/sched-fair-Introduce-per-task-io-util-boost/20240305-042115 base: tip/sched/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240304201625.100619-2-christian.loehle%40arm.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Introduce per-task io util boost config: openrisc-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240307/202403071415.olRuAaBL-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240307/202403071415.olRuAaBL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403071415.olRuAaBL-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/sched/fair.c:6703:22: warning: 'io_boost_rq' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 6703 | static unsigned long io_boost_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/io_boost_rq +6703 kernel/sched/fair.c 6702 > 6703 static unsigned long io_boost_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) 6704 { 6705 int i; 6706 6707 for (i = IO_BOOST_LEVELS; i > 0; i--) 6708 if (atomic_read(&cfs_rq->io_boost_tasks[i - 1])) 6709 return i * IO_BOOST_UTIL_STEP; 6710 return 0; 6711 } 6712 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki