From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69C6521353 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 01:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709859620; cv=none; b=a5zM6hJrpovaStlKhY5cfSlhRZNp+LJ0LLyp6fuiJL8+WcC/D+rCg2hZSPUPCk866VeZt8GqiMezIVYeKrml/G/HX7Z67zjxBDArm9+bj5T1dGS2o/x5A4ZZkcptpnf6tvX/X/2UN2dHL/28Smoh7H6AX5xEK+hffb2Z226K12M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709859620; c=relaxed/simple; bh=er9iUe3d1wOEFS6QXl+S8kmpYMEuP3OheavW2bfOwug=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=h5lrUekD6rw8GePVYiMr9cnMcly+VFaTc1c1wAycc+Nxd03WW/dCn1u+i/FLttbKjd3waQ9BouG36+l6il70/xVGpmfSeaqsGphYnDyiV8owW2HG719E/+GDViJ9iL+nN9akEIzsZJ0lraugJftvSSRMV22EGiiD4Uf2F2bvfX0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=mVQh8DB1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mVQh8DB1" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709859618; x=1741395618; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=er9iUe3d1wOEFS6QXl+S8kmpYMEuP3OheavW2bfOwug=; b=mVQh8DB17UTGvqXk1IEn0RzrOCKhCv6orCo2gqrGtkX/Aj+dUnYuWDj9 S99ax16xUzT3oiKvf73OXnFvEf0ks8SKjd1firwkpooiP4ru+a9tbXUnd KtLFOsrvkqLK3Lvh8DUwoiFr8GVFDW/tAOA5QwWCre2nTVmsj7ONJbB2S PvHTSxyAKQHv569swkSjbaiGGGNoPb4J4kGOpSTSxm9w6w54BlhwSFFsv gQ07sMvOva6YokhNw9QVWK6ep5VkkwxHBzpK9JkCRet4rpnLCcA/9FpeD 2s/BPgw4DXuWdYvq0XrZTit+oV/um5m5zWpv4pclEeSm4tCxxXxMTBzpt Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11006"; a="15994094" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,108,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="15994094" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2024 16:58:30 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,108,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="10417935" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2024 16:58:28 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1riOZ6-0005qf-1Y; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 00:58:24 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 08:57:39 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Sriram Dash Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] USB: dwc3: qcom: Add support for firmware managed resources Message-ID: <202403080837.mI1doJRI-lkp@intel.com> References: <1709657858-8563-3-git-send-email-quic_sriramd@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1709657858-8563-3-git-send-email-quic_sriramd@quicinc.com> Hi Sriram, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on next-20240305] [cannot apply to robh/for-next usb/usb-testing usb/usb-next usb/usb-linus linus/master v6.8-rc7 v6.8-rc6 v6.8-rc5 v6.8-rc7] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sriram-Dash/dt-bindings-usb-qcom-dwc3-Add-support-for-multiple-power-domains/20240306-010051 base: next-20240305 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1709657858-8563-3-git-send-email-quic_sriramd%40quicinc.com patch subject: [RFC 2/3] USB: dwc3: qcom: Add support for firmware managed resources config: sh-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240308/202403080837.mI1doJRI-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240308/202403080837.mI1doJRI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403080837.mI1doJRI-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c:157: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'pd_list' not described in 'qcom_snps_hsphy' >> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c:157: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'genpd_core' not described in 'qcom_snps_hsphy' >> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c:157: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'genpd_transfer' not described in 'qcom_snps_hsphy' >> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c:157: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'fw_managed' not described in 'qcom_snps_hsphy' >> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c:157: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'snps_femto_v2_device_ops' not described in 'qcom_snps_hsphy' vim +157 drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-snps-femto-v2.c 114 115 /** 116 * struct qcom_snps_hsphy - snps hs phy attributes 117 * 118 * @dev: device structure 119 * 120 * @phy: generic phy 121 * @base: iomapped memory space for snps hs phy 122 * 123 * @num_clks: number of clocks 124 * @clks: array of clocks 125 * @phy_reset: phy reset control 126 * @vregs: regulator supplies bulk data 127 * @phy_initialized: if PHY has been initialized correctly 128 * @mode: contains the current mode the PHY is in 129 * @update_seq_cfg: tuning parameters for phy init 130 */ 131 struct qcom_snps_hsphy { 132 struct device *dev; 133 134 struct phy *phy; 135 void __iomem *base; 136 137 int num_clks; 138 struct clk_bulk_data *clks; 139 struct reset_control *phy_reset; 140 struct regulator_bulk_data vregs[SNPS_HS_NUM_VREGS]; 141 142 bool phy_initialized; 143 enum phy_mode mode; 144 struct phy_override_seq update_seq_cfg[NUM_HSPHY_TUNING_PARAMS]; 145 146 struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list; 147 struct device *genpd_core; 148 struct device *genpd_transfer; 149 150 bool fw_managed; 151 /* separate resource management for fw_managed vs locally managed devices */ 152 struct snps_femto_v2_device_ops { 153 int (*resume_resource)(struct qcom_snps_hsphy *hsphy); 154 int (*suspend_resource)(struct qcom_snps_hsphy *hsphy); 155 } snps_femto_v2_device_ops; 156 > 157 }; 158 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki