From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: edumazet@google.com, pablo@netfilter.org, kadlec@netfilter.org,
fw@strlen.de, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: dccp: try not to drop skb in conntrack
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:29:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240308092915.9751-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
It would be better not to drop skb in conntrack unless we have good
alternative as Florian said[1]. So we can treat the result of testing
skb's header pointer as nf_conntrack_tcp_packet() does.
[1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240307141025.GL4420@breakpoint.cc/
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c
index e2db1f4ec2df..ebc4f733bb2e 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ int nf_conntrack_dccp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct, struct sk_buff *skb,
dh = skb_header_pointer(skb, dataoff, sizeof(*dh), &_dh.dh);
if (!dh)
- return NF_DROP;
+ return -NF_ACCEPT;
if (dccp_error(dh, skb, dataoff, state))
return -NF_ACCEPT;
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ int nf_conntrack_dccp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct, struct sk_buff *skb,
/* pull again, including possible 48 bit sequences and subtype header */
dh = dccp_header_pointer(skb, dataoff, dh, &_dh);
if (!dh)
- return NF_DROP;
+ return -NF_ACCEPT;
type = dh->dccph_type;
if (!nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct) && !dccp_new(ct, skb, dh, state))
--
2.37.3
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 9:29 Jason Xing [this message]
2024-03-08 9:29 ` [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: using NF_DROP in test statement in nf_conntrack_in() Jason Xing
2024-03-11 6:37 ` [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: dccp: try not to drop skb in conntrack Jason Xing
2024-03-11 15:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-03-11 16:00 ` Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240308092915.9751-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.