From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik1@huawei-partners.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 6/6] swiotlb: Reinstate page-alignment for mappings >= PAGE_SIZE
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 15:28:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240308152829.25754-7-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240308152829.25754-1-will@kernel.org>
For swiotlb allocations >= PAGE_SIZE, the slab search historically
adjusted the stride to avoid checking unaligned slots. This had the
side-effect of aligning large mapping requests to PAGE_SIZE, but that
was broken by 0eee5ae10256 ("swiotlb: fix slot alignment checks").
Since this alignment could be relied upon drivers, reinstate PAGE_SIZE
alignment for swiotlb mappings >= PAGE_SIZE.
Reported-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index c381a7ed718f..c5851034523f 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -992,6 +992,17 @@ static int swiotlb_search_pool_area(struct device *dev, struct io_tlb_pool *pool
BUG_ON(!nslots);
BUG_ON(area_index >= pool->nareas);
+ /*
+ * Historically, swiotlb allocations >= PAGE_SIZE were guaranteed to be
+ * page-aligned in the absence of any other alignment requirements.
+ * 'alloc_align_mask' was later introduced to specify the alignment
+ * explicitly, however this is passed as zero for streaming mappings
+ * and so we preserve the old behaviour there in case any drivers are
+ * relying on it.
+ */
+ if (!alloc_align_mask && !iotlb_align_mask && alloc_size >= PAGE_SIZE)
+ alloc_align_mask = PAGE_SIZE - 1;
+
/*
* Ensure that the allocation is at least slot-aligned and update
* 'iotlb_align_mask' to ignore bits that will be preserved when
@@ -1006,13 +1017,6 @@ static int swiotlb_search_pool_area(struct device *dev, struct io_tlb_pool *pool
*/
stride = get_max_slots(max(alloc_align_mask, iotlb_align_mask));
- /*
- * For allocations of PAGE_SIZE or larger only look for page aligned
- * allocations.
- */
- if (alloc_size >= PAGE_SIZE)
- stride = umax(stride, PAGE_SHIFT - IO_TLB_SHIFT + 1);
-
spin_lock_irqsave(&area->lock, flags);
if (unlikely(nslots > pool->area_nslabs - area->used))
goto not_found;
--
2.44.0.278.ge034bb2e1d-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 15:28 [PATCH v6 0/6] Fix double allocation in swiotlb_alloc() Will Deacon
2024-03-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] swiotlb: Fix double-allocation of slots due to broken alignment handling Will Deacon
2024-03-18 3:39 ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-18 12:36 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] swiotlb: Enforce page alignment in swiotlb_alloc() Will Deacon
2024-03-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] swiotlb: Honour dma_alloc_coherent() " Will Deacon
2024-03-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] swiotlb: Fix alignment checks when both allocation and DMA masks are present Will Deacon
2024-03-11 20:05 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-11 21:36 ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-11 22:49 ` Will Deacon
2024-03-12 8:52 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-12 9:38 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 9:51 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-12 12:57 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 0:52 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-03-12 10:44 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-08 15:28 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] iommu/dma: Force swiotlb_max_mapping_size on an untrusted device Will Deacon
2024-03-08 15:28 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2024-03-08 16:08 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] swiotlb: Reinstate page-alignment for mappings >= PAGE_SIZE Robin Murphy
2024-03-08 16:38 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-08 16:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-08 17:22 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-08 17:17 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-08 18:08 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-08 17:28 ` Petr Tesařík
2024-03-08 19:02 ` Michael Kelley
2024-03-08 19:21 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] Fix double allocation in swiotlb_alloc() Michael Kelley
2024-03-11 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-11 23:19 ` Will Deacon
2024-03-11 22:55 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240308152829.25754-7-will@kernel.org \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=petr.tesarik1@huawei-partners.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.