All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	keescook@chromium.org,
	"open list:HFI1 DRIVER" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] IB/hfi1: allocate dummy net_device dynamically
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:25:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240311112532.71f1cb35@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240311102251.GJ12921@unreal>

On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:22:51 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From my experience, you can leverage all the helpers to deal with the
> > relationship between struct net_device and you private structure. Here
> > are some examples that comes to my mind:
> > 
> > * alloc_netdev() allocates the private structure for you
> > * netdev_priv() gets the private structure for you
> > * dev->priv_destructor sets the destructure to be called when the
> >   interface goes away or failures.  
> 
> Everything above is true, but it doesn't relevant to HFI1 devices which
> are not netdev devices.

Why are they abusing struct net_device then?
If you're willing to take care of removing the use of NAPI from this
driver completely, that'd be great.

> > > Will it create multiple "dummy" netdev in the system? Will all devices
> > > have the same "dummy" name?  
> > 
> > Are these devices visible to userspace?  
> 
> HFI devices yes, dummy device no.
> 
> > 
> > This allocation are using NET_NAME_UNKNOWN, which implies that the
> > device is not expose to userspace.  
> 
> Great
> 
> > 
> > Would you prefer a different name?  
> 
> I prefer to see some new wrapper over plain alloc_netdev, which will
> create this dummy netdevice. For example, alloc_dummy_netdev(...).

Nope, no bona fide APIs for hacky uses.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-11 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-08 18:29 [PATCH net-next] IB/hfi1: allocate dummy net_device dynamically Breno Leitao
2024-03-10 10:14 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-03-11 10:08   ` Breno Leitao
2024-03-11 10:22     ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-03-11 18:25       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-03-12  7:52         ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-03-11 12:05 ` Dennis Dalessandro
2024-03-11 12:17   ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-03-11 15:32   ` Breno Leitao
2024-03-11 22:22     ` Dennis Dalessandro
2024-03-12  7:55     ` Leon Romanovsky
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-26  8:56 Breno Leitao
2024-04-30 12:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-04-30 14:03   ` Dennis Dalessandro
2024-04-30 14:10     ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-04-30 14:55       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-30 15:53         ` Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240311112532.71f1cb35@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.