All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.2 8/8] xfs: test for premature ENOSPC with large cow delalloc extents
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 08:04:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240311150454.GC6188@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240311134001.6qflb7gjyjnwwetr@dell-per750-06-vm-08.rhts.eng.pek2.redhat.com>

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:40:01PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 09:26:54AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 05:17:34PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:22:55PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > > 
> > > > On a higly fragmented filesystem a Direct IO write can fail with -ENOSPC error
> > > > even though the filesystem has sufficient number of free blocks.
> > > > 
> > > > This occurs if the file offset range on which the write operation is being
> > > > performed has a delalloc extent in the cow fork and this delalloc extent
> > > > begins much before the Direct IO range.
> > > > 
> > > > In such a scenario, xfs_reflink_allocate_cow() invokes xfs_bmapi_write() to
> > > > allocate the blocks mapped by the delalloc extent. The extent thus allocated
> > > > may not cover the beginning of file offset range on which the Direct IO write
> > > > was issued. Hence xfs_reflink_allocate_cow() ends up returning -ENOSPC.
> > > > 
> > > > This test addresses this issue.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > v1.1: address some missing bits and remove extraneous code
> > > > v1.2: fix cow fork dumping screwing up golden output
> > > 
> > > This version is good to me, I'll merge it.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > BTW, I only see this patch for [PATCH 8/8], but I didn't see the "later" patch
> > > for [PATCH 6/8], just to make sure if I missed something :)
> > 
> > Oh!  Yeah, on re-reading that thread, I remembered that Christoph said
> > he'd look into making xfs_ondisk.h check ioctl structure sizes like
> > xfs/122 currently does.
> > 
> > In the meantime, there weren't any changes other than your RVB tag.  If
> > you want, I can resend it with that added.
> 
> Oh, if that patch don't need to be changed, I'll merge it directly, don't
> need resending it :)

That's correct -- the patch itself doesn't need changes, but the test
itself may get removed some day.

--D

> > 
> > --D
> > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Zorro
> > > 
> > > > ---
> > > >  common/rc          |   14 ++++++++
> > > >  tests/xfs/1923     |   86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  tests/xfs/1923.out |    8 +++++
> > > >  3 files changed, 108 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/1923
> > > >  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/1923.out
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > > > index 50dde313b8..9f54ab1e77 100644
> > > > --- a/common/rc
> > > > +++ b/common/rc
> > > > @@ -1883,6 +1883,20 @@ _require_scratch_delalloc()
> > > >  	_scratch_unmount
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > +# Require test fs supports delay allocation.
> > > > +_require_test_delalloc()
> > > > +{
> > > > +	_require_command "$FILEFRAG_PROG" filefrag
> > > > +
> > > > +	rm -f $TEST_DIR/testy
> > > > +	$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c 'pwrite 0 64k' $TEST_DIR/testy &> /dev/null
> > > > +	$FILEFRAG_PROG -v $TEST_DIR/testy 2>&1 | grep -q delalloc
> > > > +	res=$?
> > > > +	rm -f $TEST_DIR/testy
> > > > +	test $res -eq 0 || \
> > > > +		_notrun "test requires delayed allocation buffered writes"
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  # this test needs a test partition - check we're ok & mount it
> > > >  #
> > > >  _require_test()
> > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/1923 b/tests/xfs/1923
> > > > new file mode 100755
> > > > index 0000000000..4ad3dfa764
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tests/xfs/1923
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> > > > +#! /bin/bash
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +# Copyright (c) 2022-2024 Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.
> > > > +#
> > > > +# FS QA Test No. 1923
> > > > +#
> > > > +# This is a regression test for "xfs: Fix false ENOSPC when performing direct
> > > > +# write on a delalloc extent in cow fork".  If there is a lot of free space but
> > > > +# it is very fragmented, it's possible that a very large delalloc reservation
> > > > +# could be created in the CoW fork by a buffered write.  If a directio write
> > > > +# tries to convert the delalloc reservation to a real extent, it's possible
> > > > +# that the allocation will succeed but fail to convert even the first block of
> > > > +# the directio write range.  In this case, XFS will return ENOSPC even though
> > > > +# all it needed to do was to keep converting until the allocator returns ENOSPC
> > > > +# or the first block of the direct write got some space.
> > > > +#
> > > > +. ./common/preamble
> > > > +_begin_fstest auto quick clone
> > > > +
> > > > +_cleanup()
> > > > +{
> > > > +	cd /
> > > > +	rm -f $file1 $file2 $fragmentedfile
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +# Import common functions.
> > > > +. ./common/reflink
> > > > +. ./common/inject
> > > > +
> > > > +# real QA test starts here
> > > > +_fixed_by_kernel_commit d62113303d69 \
> > > > +	"xfs: Fix false ENOSPC when performing direct write on a delalloc extent in cow fork"
> > > > +
> > > > +# Modify as appropriate.
> > > > +_supported_fs xfs
> > > > +_require_test_program "punch-alternating"
> > > > +_require_test_reflink
> > > > +_require_xfs_io_error_injection "bmap_alloc_minlen_extent"
> > > > +_require_test_delalloc
> > > > +
> > > > +file1=$TEST_DIR/file1.$seq
> > > > +file2=$TEST_DIR/file2.$seq
> > > > +fragmentedfile=$TEST_DIR/fragmentedfile.$seq
> > > > +
> > > > +rm -f $file1 $file2 $fragmentedfile
> > > > +
> > > > +# COW operates on pages, so we must not perform operations in units smaller
> > > > +# than a page.
> > > > +blksz=$(_get_file_block_size $TEST_DIR)
> > > > +pagesz=$(_get_page_size)
> > > > +if (( $blksz < $pagesz )); then
> > > > +	blksz=$pagesz
> > > > +fi
> > > > +
> > > > +echo "Create source file"
> > > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite 0 $((blksz * 256))" $file1 >> $seqres.full
> > > > +
> > > > +sync
> > > > +
> > > > +echo "Create Reflinked file"
> > > > +_cp_reflink $file1 $file2 >> $seqres.full
> > > > +
> > > > +echo "Set cowextsize"
> > > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize $((blksz * 128))" -c stat $file1 >> $seqres.full
> > > > +
> > > > +echo "Fragment FS"
> > > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite 0 $((blksz * 512))" $fragmentedfile >> $seqres.full
> > > > +sync
> > > > +$here/src/punch-alternating $fragmentedfile
> > > > +
> > > > +echo "Allocate block sized extent from now onwards"
> > > > +_test_inject_error bmap_alloc_minlen_extent 1
> > > > +
> > > > +echo "Create big delalloc extent in CoW fork"
> > > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite 0 $blksz" $file1 >> $seqres.full
> > > > +
> > > > +sync
> > > > +
> > > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c 'bmap -elpv' -c 'bmap -celpv' $file1 &>> $seqres.full
> > > > +
> > > > +echo "Direct I/O write at offset 3FSB"
> > > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -d -c "pwrite $((blksz * 3)) $((blksz * 2))" $file1 >> $seqres.full
> > > > +
> > > > +# success, all done
> > > > +status=0
> > > > +exit
> > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/1923.out b/tests/xfs/1923.out
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000000..a0553cf3ee
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tests/xfs/1923.out
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> > > > +QA output created by 1923
> > > > +Create source file
> > > > +Create Reflinked file
> > > > +Set cowextsize
> > > > +Fragment FS
> > > > +Allocate block sized extent from now onwards
> > > > +Create big delalloc extent in CoW fork
> > > > +Direct I/O write at offset 3FSB
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-11 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-27  2:00 [PATCHSET] fstests: random fixes for v2024.02.09 Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  2:00 ` [PATCH 1/8] generic/604: try to make race occur reliably Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  4:04   ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-27  4:27     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  4:40   ` [PATCH v1.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  5:15     ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-27 14:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-02 11:44       ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-27  2:01 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs/155: fail the test if xfs_repair hangs for too long Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  4:16   ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-27  4:41   ` [PATCH v1.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  5:14     ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-27 14:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-27  2:01 ` [PATCH 3/8] generic/192: fix spurious timeout Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  4:23   ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-27  4:29     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27 14:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-27  2:01 ` [PATCH 4/8] generic/491: increase test timeout Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  4:28   ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-27 14:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-27  2:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs/599: reduce the amount of attrs created here Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  4:33   ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-27  2:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs/122: update test to pick up rtword/suminfo ondisk unions Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  5:10   ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-27 14:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-28  1:27     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-28 15:39       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-29 17:48         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-29 19:42           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-01 13:18             ` Zorro Lang
2024-03-01 17:50               ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-02  4:55                 ` Zorro Lang
2024-03-07 23:24                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  2:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs/43[4-6]: make module reloading optional Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  5:31   ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-28  1:28     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-01 17:51   ` [PATCH v1.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-02 12:04     ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-27  2:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: test for premature ENOSPC with large cow delalloc extents Darrick J. Wong
2024-02-27  6:00   ` Zorro Lang
2024-02-28  1:36     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-01 17:52   ` [PATCH v1.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-02 20:50     ` Zorro Lang
2024-03-07 23:17       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-07 23:22   ` [PATCH v1.2 " Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-10  9:17     ` Zorro Lang
2024-03-10 16:26       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-03-11 13:40         ` Zorro Lang
2024-03-11 15:04           ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-03-03 13:34 ` [PATCHSET] fstests: random fixes for v2024.02.09 Zorro Lang
2024-03-07 23:18   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240311150454.GC6188@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.