From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CF9279933; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710253660; cv=none; b=ib9sZtXoXAka08jHI1sIZ3i2zZx7t58A1dUfrotRaj/qmt2VNYRFwz4WEUfeLhdRjJcK1WmqtUP1YpnE9L7Tc2Nc8ZVaZPDTkcXELnHrIL3lBpgXt/3dSYzljmQ67QpT+KpuLBqLDFftLyyMb2suv77QfvbVkD82rvjIXuP4q8I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710253660; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bvndcJKgC/kiItScSENHsgi4u+xxjLobnUDEB/IFVlE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ftna7HSxdqos779ukCNHpDew6Pc0drzvZn0qafugcWEadYqI4GpvC2/94k+73nmU30yk+xWKrKAc9L7B/g1ZbG+wxtDdXGZgmj8Z32vZW6NRdfkvDjx5ZhIKgRyy2GJWq9WMFsB5f6f/S3LlibLIjTK+lwklQVdCsMDa0xh64mM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=S2E2gY86; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="S2E2gY86" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F516C433C7; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:27:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1710253659; bh=bvndcJKgC/kiItScSENHsgi4u+xxjLobnUDEB/IFVlE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=S2E2gY86B6K2Qx/XA1LALB2vephl9VjNUEbRksClTVaBq45YMp6q79KYThBBx61Ab PTDkos2aNFWq1vrMKcv9+jOWqcHuiiH9Vi4YyL8zdv5o/zavVhgP3tj9NpfwCjJvSS rUMEq5X1k76Wc7fhC6vz35y1Ktznt8h1tWlRammGISbYubSxeLYxITDQifvY2zyuqS DoJtv7oXzr7f3+5M7neQzqlbm/lbv7hF+x3yn18AdA0nMkyu02eTvN5NyAz+UCt9us x9ttdkV9KZpHzkUPbKMrfSz5haoMImkYY19RF6Dt+7RZhLdi6RTmOvbGkHog+rYlfR R26WMuaQhKAtg== Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:27:33 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Kent Overstreet Cc: Johannes Thumshirn , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Josef Bacik , Miklos Szeredi , David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] statx: stx_subvol Message-ID: <20240312-erstrahlen-lauch-9fc2b6ba3829@brauner> References: <20240308022914.196982-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev> <2f598709-fccb-4364-bf15-f9c171b440aa@wdc.com> <20240311-zugeparkt-mulden-48b143bf51e0@brauner> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 04:15:04PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 02:43:11PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 08:12:33AM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > > > On 08.03.24 03:29, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > > Add a new statx field for (sub)volume identifiers, as implemented by > > > > btrfs and bcachefs. > > > > > > > > This includes bcachefs support; we'll definitely want btrfs support as > > > > well. > > > > > > For btrfs you can add the following: > > > > > > > > > From 82343b7cb2a947bca43234c443b9c22339367f68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Johannes Thumshirn > > > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:09:36 +0100 > > > Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: provide subvolume id for statx > > > > > > Add the inode's subvolume id to the newly proposed statx subvol field. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn > > > --- > > > > Thanks, will fold, once I hear from Josef. > > Can we try to make 6.9? Need to know what to put in the manpage, and > I've got userspace tooling that wants to use it. Hm, I understand that you want to see this done but I think it's just too tight. If this would've been Acked last week then we could've done it the second week of the merge window. So my reaction is to wait for v6.10. What do others think?