All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	"kernel@collabora.com" <kernel@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [Test Failure Report] exec: Test failures in execveat
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 20:05:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202403132004.84C9C50A5@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf98ff2f-66a8-4800-855f-5c03c952b514@collabora.com>

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:08:36PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> On 3/8/24 1:39 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:22:27PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> >> I've tested this patch. Still getting same failures.
> > 
> > Okay, thanks for testing!
> > 
> > What environment are you testing under? It would seem like some unexpected
> > userspace conditions exist that the test isn't prepared for. (I was able
> > to reproduce one error with /bin/dash, for example, but not the others,
> > so something must be different in the set up.)
> I'm testing on Debian Bookworm with v6.1, v6.7 and next-20240304 kernels.
> I've tested it on another VM which is also Debian Bookworm. The default
> shell is dash on Debian as well.

Do you know which kernel version this _passes_ on? I haven't been able
to find when this actually returned the expected values...

-- 
Kees Cook

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-14  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-05 14:20 [Test Failure Report] exec: Test failures in execveat Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-05 21:00 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-07  9:22   ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-07 20:39     ` Kees Cook
2024-03-11 17:08       ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-13  5:23         ` Kees Cook
2024-03-14  3:05         ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-03-14  8:49           ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-19 11:17 Khannanov Lenar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202403132004.84C9C50A5@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.