All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Trofimov <i.trofimow@yandex.ru>
To: brauner@kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] eventpoll: optimize epoll_ctl by reusing eppoll_entry allocations
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:20:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240317222004.76084-1-i.trofimow@yandex.ru> (raw)

Instead of unconditionally allocating and deallocating pwq objects,
try to reuse them by storing the entry in the eventpoll struct
at deallocation request, and consuming that entry at allocation request.
This way every EPOLL_CTL_ADD operation immediately following an
EPOLL_CTL_DEL operation effectively cancels out its pwq allocation
with the preceding deallocation.

With this patch applied I'm observing ~13% overall speedup when 
benchmarking the following scenario:
1. epoll_ctl(..., EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ...)
2. epoll_ctl(..., EPOLL_CTL_DEL, ...)
which should be a pretty common one for either applications dealing with
a lot of short-lived connections or applications doing a DEL + ADD dance
per level-triggered FD readiness.

This optimization comes with a sizeof(void*) + sizeof(struct eppoll_entry)
per-epoll-instance memory cost, which amounts to 72 bytes for 64-bit.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Trofimov <i.trofimow@yandex.ru>
---
This is my first ever attempt at submiting a patch for the kernel,
so please don't hesitate to point out mistakes I'm doing in the process.

 fs/eventpoll.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index 882b89edc..c4094124c 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -219,6 +219,9 @@ struct eventpoll {
 	u64 gen;
 	struct hlist_head refs;
 
+	/* a single-item cache used to reuse eppoll_entry allocations */
+	struct eppoll_entry *pwq_slot;
+
 	/*
 	 * usage count, used together with epitem->dying to
 	 * orchestrate the disposal of this struct
@@ -648,6 +651,36 @@ static void ep_remove_wait_queue(struct eppoll_entry *pwq)
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
+/*
+ * This functions either consumes the pwq_slot, or allocates a new
+ * eppoll_entry if the slot is empty.
+ * Must be called with "mtx" held.
+ */
+static struct eppoll_entry *ep_alloc_pwq(struct eventpoll *ep)
+{
+	struct eppoll_entry *pwq = ep->pwq_slot;
+
+	if (pwq) {
+		ep->pwq_slot = NULL;
+		return pwq;
+	}
+	return kmem_cache_alloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function either fills the pwq_slot with the eppoll_entry,
+ * or deallocates the entry if the slot is already filled.
+ * Must be called with "mtx" held.
+ */
+static void ep_free_pwq(struct eventpoll *ep, struct eppoll_entry *pwq)
+{
+	if (!ep->pwq_slot) {
+		ep->pwq_slot = pwq;
+		return;
+	}
+	kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
+}
+
 /*
  * This function unregisters poll callbacks from the associated file
  * descriptor.  Must be called with "mtx" held.
@@ -660,7 +693,7 @@ static void ep_unregister_pollwait(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi)
 	while ((pwq = *p) != NULL) {
 		*p = pwq->next;
 		ep_remove_wait_queue(pwq);
-		kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
+		ep_free_pwq(ep, pwq);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -789,6 +822,8 @@ static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
 	mutex_destroy(&ep->mtx);
 	free_uid(ep->user);
 	wakeup_source_unregister(ep->ws);
+	if (ep->pwq_slot)
+		kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, ep->pwq_slot);
 	kfree(ep);
 }
 
@@ -1384,7 +1419,7 @@ static void ep_ptable_queue_proc(struct file *file, wait_queue_head_t *whead,
 	if (unlikely(!epi))	// an earlier allocation has failed
 		return;
 
-	pwq = kmem_cache_alloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+	pwq = ep_alloc_pwq(epi->ep);
 	if (unlikely(!pwq)) {
 		epq->epi = NULL;
 		return;
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2024-03-17 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-17 22:20 Ivan Trofimov [this message]
2024-03-18  4:59 ` [PATCH RFC] eventpoll: optimize epoll_ctl by reusing eppoll_entry allocations Eric Biggers
2024-03-18  9:57   ` Ivan Trofimov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240317222004.76084-1-i.trofimow@yandex.ru \
    --to=i.trofimow@yandex.ru \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.