From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC8D7CD11C2 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rn4Cp-0004e6-57; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 18:14:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rn4Cn-0004dc-RE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 18:14:41 -0400 Received: from mail-bn8nam04on20600.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([2a01:111:f403:2408::600] helo=NAM04-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rn4Cm-0002te-2E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 18:14:41 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=RIYswS++TQT8wKiz1dcRtx0QYt+NKNZStqzDCYZTlpuMCmkD6trvpDMVts8BKNuyiuhSnfHaQiK/e3bZz3b5kNy8ldAFiAeWsdFeGIpYrKBuWnYcqxKpRAghQcdFvYtY2Aes5oaDvShRQz6cP5SDByvkQDBfBwNMxUeNAZJ3dkBGI/S1YScSlqDjNP67miwF1iWtLIhv/F5oEYmpKXXQz++U0DVWYS2Tih4/Ak0DVcsLtaiMRgJtd7mnyvI4CDsLnLS51vdkQzPAS2prSalLDQNUiWwyI4KMUpwpnQ1IJkX5XAPyjl19qk2oac0jWHSUC67a7mOJKMz87/U4oJkg8w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=k4nDCye8BmsaDu9v1gfNUR0YQsqnfqiNV+HHQmJvF9I=; b=EW/kbBGO39GEWkHOuzxM1wvpFahoa14mkeFTBPbINmrN3H/52/ywe2xhGSZ/NsRkpNRXD8l6Lh5pEJ6bE24sJnO9OijmT0h2uWWlBBgSzlGeId3ftj3iGUUAhLtWNxIVbp95PSdNtjM0FgqCWh1IuCwxZsBSvQtTksINYvxegXLhq8q0BxJrKJp5QD+QYRK+YBA7KB0OCQkwWEu9DHwUJby93rL9tlrXr64DQJsiWBMYxcpZKHq6ZnOBy4777qwi3Zfx/5Mn2a0uxHW8iMOldFBoTGNW2rhF7S0zLiQHWkV4IfVLFIfr0wPyjjnevDCY3UJHqbxwjSJUwx7wxJGPeA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=redhat.com smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amd.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=k4nDCye8BmsaDu9v1gfNUR0YQsqnfqiNV+HHQmJvF9I=; b=CuhwcK3HjTNrMPPysDTr1hmnXz/t6Z9XLpc3/B6/i9HGmqmCNC0pWp6U18YRVOnpMyRBI/xpUuGac8I/lJoEOyidzctlytQUTjKla2Db6PFyeovzgrVMzelqkH7oaD2IDtFBAh0gzAtIcMXTusO6fU9aU0Iwuwlf7BkoPY04VNQ= Received: from BL1PR13CA0266.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:2ba::31) by SN7PR12MB6863.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:264::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7386.30; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:14:36 +0000 Received: from BN3PEPF0000B072.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:2ba:cafe::c6) by BL1PR13CA0266.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:208:2ba::31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7409.12 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:14:35 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 165.204.84.17) smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C Received: from SATLEXMB04.amd.com (165.204.84.17) by BN3PEPF0000B072.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.243.117) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.7409.10 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:14:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (10.180.168.240) by SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:14:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:14:10 -0500 From: Michael Roth To: Paolo Bonzini CC: , , Tom Lendacky , Daniel P =?utf-8?B?LiBCZXJyYW5nw6k=?= , Markus Armbruster , Pankaj Gupta , Xiaoyao Li , Isaku Yamahata Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 25/49] i386/sev: Skip RAMBlock notifiers for SNP Message-ID: <20240320221410.fdfuzjpzzwaeqjaw@amd.com> References: <20240320083945.991426-1-michael.roth@amd.com> <20240320083945.991426-26-michael.roth@amd.com> <7727f1f2-2a30-45d2-85a9-db22ec5a9be5@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7727f1f2-2a30-45d2-85a9-db22ec5a9be5@redhat.com> X-Originating-IP: [10.180.168.240] X-ClientProxiedBy: SATLEXMB03.amd.com (10.181.40.144) To SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BN3PEPF0000B072:EE_|SN7PR12MB6863:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 89783dbc-e6e8-4b2b-ee40-08dc492b2012 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.17; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:CAL; SFV:NSPM; H:SATLEXMB04.amd.com; PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230031)(376005)(82310400014)(36860700004)(1800799015); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Mar 2024 22:14:34.9831 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 89783dbc-e6e8-4b2b-ee40-08dc492b2012 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d; Ip=[165.204.84.17]; Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN3PEPF0000B072.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN7PR12MB6863 Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=2a01:111:f403:2408::600; envelope-from=Michael.Roth@amd.com; helo=NAM04-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.417, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:46:29AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 3/20/24 09:39, Michael Roth wrote: > > SEV uses these notifiers to register/pin pages prior to guest use, since > > they could potentially be used for private memory where page migration > > is not supported. But SNP only uses guest_memfd-provided pages for > > private memory, which has its own kernel-internal mechanisms for > > registering/pinning memory. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Roth > > --- > > target/i386/sev.c | 10 +++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/target/i386/sev.c b/target/i386/sev.c > > index 61af312a11..774262d834 100644 > > --- a/target/i386/sev.c > > +++ b/target/i386/sev.c > > @@ -982,7 +982,15 @@ static int sev_kvm_init(ConfidentialGuestSupport *cgs, Error **errp) > > goto err; > > } > > - ram_block_notifier_add(&sev_ram_notifier); > > + if (!sev_snp_enabled()) { > > + /* > > + * SEV uses these notifiers to register/pin pages prior to guest use, > > + * but SNP relies on guest_memfd for private pages, which has it's > > + * own internal mechanisms for registering/pinning private memory. > > + */ > > + ram_block_notifier_add(&sev_ram_notifier); > > + } > > + > > qemu_add_machine_init_done_notifier(&sev_machine_done_notify); > > qemu_add_vm_change_state_handler(sev_vm_state_change, sev_common); > > These three lines can be done in any order, so I suggest removing > ram_block_notifier_add + qemu_add_machine_init_done_notifier from the > sev-common implementation of kvm_init (let's call it sev_common_kvm_init); > and add an override in sev-guest that calls them if sev_common_kvm_init() > succeeds. > > (treat this as a review for 25/26/29). Makes sense. Will split out the common bits of sev_kvm_init() and use class methods for initialization specific to sev-guest and sev-snp-guest. -Mike > > Paolo >