From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B33AC47DD9 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 05:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858813CD60E for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:32:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62FC03C81C3 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:32:21 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-5.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5B3A600C3B for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:32:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A82738074; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 05:32:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1711085539; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0ilAhWal9Lo/Gw9rnmeuV/2MEoVkPkklww3jjVYdZU0=; b=MR3N0WhDCZ7j5S8OUL7NkIOv1sHjUvFFcnPZfzulw1X63i8742JTO9pGyHu8NR13AXf2oZ GRNdoTwZxMPHpvqkiQIyjvfpYSYU7tCZWO4zxCNKCh6a1LgWOZIa5xJHQ3pHey6oKT6Mr4 pUuLUh7rU1xLazYE9cOXZ2qE+pGiLWU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1711085539; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0ilAhWal9Lo/Gw9rnmeuV/2MEoVkPkklww3jjVYdZU0=; b=CjHGuMFb0b0mFljUcDFysGZ79qQkKY12cMLa79tjY6mAPW5p+gF5SYSOBCeXDUj75Aahh4 NHfJem/EjTifaLBA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1711085539; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0ilAhWal9Lo/Gw9rnmeuV/2MEoVkPkklww3jjVYdZU0=; b=MR3N0WhDCZ7j5S8OUL7NkIOv1sHjUvFFcnPZfzulw1X63i8742JTO9pGyHu8NR13AXf2oZ GRNdoTwZxMPHpvqkiQIyjvfpYSYU7tCZWO4zxCNKCh6a1LgWOZIa5xJHQ3pHey6oKT6Mr4 pUuLUh7rU1xLazYE9cOXZ2qE+pGiLWU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1711085539; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0ilAhWal9Lo/Gw9rnmeuV/2MEoVkPkklww3jjVYdZU0=; b=CjHGuMFb0b0mFljUcDFysGZ79qQkKY12cMLa79tjY6mAPW5p+gF5SYSOBCeXDUj75Aahh4 NHfJem/EjTifaLBA== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE236136AD; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 05:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id Yy5LOeIX/WW+eQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 22 Mar 2024 05:32:18 +0000 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:32:17 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Li Wang Message-ID: <20240322053217.GA588706@pevik> References: <20240322030208.3278120-1-liwang@redhat.com> <20240322050046.GA572447@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=MR3N0WhD; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=CjHGuMFb X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.71 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.00)[32.02%]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0A82738074 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/2] libswap: add two methods to create swapfile X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Li, > > - char mnt_path[100]; > > + char mnt_path[128]; > > nit: why this increase to 128? Why not PATH_MAX? > No special meaning, I just thought of using 2 raised to the nth power. > But you're right, PATCH_MAX will be safer. +1 ... > Thanks, I would give the patch set more time in case others have comments. Sure. Thanks for a nice work! Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp