FAILED: Patch "drm/amd/display: Fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dcn35_clkmgr" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

[Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>]

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

Thanks,
Sasha

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From a8edc9cc0b14e3769bbc9b82d00e5e5fc6b5ff0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:07:24 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix array-index-out-of-bounds in
 dcn35_clkmgr

[Why]
There is a potential memory access violation while
iterating through array of dcn35 clks.

[How]
Limit iteration per array size.

Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
---
 .../amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn35/dcn35_clk_mgr.c  | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn35/dcn35_clk_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn35/dcn35_clk_mgr.c
index 36e5bb611fb10..c378b879c76d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn35/dcn35_clk_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn35/dcn35_clk_mgr.c
@@ -658,10 +658,13 @@ static void dcn35_clk_mgr_helper_populate_bw_params(struct clk_mgr_internal *clk
 	struct clk_limit_table_entry def_max = bw_params->clk_table.entries[bw_params->clk_table.num_entries - 1];
 	uint32_t max_fclk = 0, min_pstate = 0, max_dispclk = 0, max_dppclk = 0;
 	uint32_t max_pstate = 0, max_dram_speed_mts = 0, min_dram_speed_mts = 0;
+	uint32_t num_memps, num_fclk, num_dcfclk;
 	int i;
 
 	/* Determine min/max p-state values. */
-	for (i = 0; i < clock_table->NumMemPstatesEnabled; i++) {
+	num_memps = (clock_table->NumMemPstatesEnabled > NUM_MEM_PSTATE_LEVELS) ? NUM_MEM_PSTATE_LEVELS :
+		clock_table->NumMemPstatesEnabled;
+	for (i = 0; i < num_memps; i++) {
 		uint32_t dram_speed_mts = calc_dram_speed_mts(&clock_table->MemPstateTable[i]);
 
 		if (is_valid_clock_value(dram_speed_mts) && dram_speed_mts > max_dram_speed_mts) {
@@ -673,7 +676,7 @@ static void dcn35_clk_mgr_helper_populate_bw_params(struct clk_mgr_internal *clk
 	min_dram_speed_mts = max_dram_speed_mts;
 	min_pstate = max_pstate;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < clock_table->NumMemPstatesEnabled; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < num_memps; i++) {
 		uint32_t dram_speed_mts = calc_dram_speed_mts(&clock_table->MemPstateTable[i]);
 
 		if (is_valid_clock_value(dram_speed_mts) && dram_speed_mts < min_dram_speed_mts) {
@@ -702,9 +705,13 @@ static void dcn35_clk_mgr_helper_populate_bw_params(struct clk_mgr_internal *clk
 	/* Base the clock table on dcfclk, need at least one entry regardless of pmfw table */
 	ASSERT(clock_table->NumDcfClkLevelsEnabled > 0);
 
-	max_fclk = find_max_clk_value(clock_table->FclkClocks_Freq, clock_table->NumFclkLevelsEnabled);
+	num_fclk = (clock_table->NumFclkLevelsEnabled > NUM_FCLK_DPM_LEVELS) ? NUM_FCLK_DPM_LEVELS :
+		clock_table->NumFclkLevelsEnabled;
+	max_fclk = find_max_clk_value(clock_table->FclkClocks_Freq, num_fclk);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < clock_table->NumDcfClkLevelsEnabled; i++) {
+	num_dcfclk = (clock_table->NumFclkLevelsEnabled > NUM_DCFCLK_DPM_LEVELS) ? NUM_DCFCLK_DPM_LEVELS :
+		clock_table->NumDcfClkLevelsEnabled;
+	for (i = 0; i < num_dcfclk; i++) {
 		int j;
 
 		/* First search defaults for the clocks we don't read using closest lower or equal default dcfclk */
-- 
2.43.0