From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jasowang@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
stefanha@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com, keirf@google.com,
yihyu@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] vhost: Improve vhost_get_avail_idx() with smp_rmb()
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:31:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240328052814-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240328002149.1141302-4-gshan@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 10:21:49AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> All the callers of vhost_get_avail_idx() are concerned to the memory
> barrier, imposed by smp_rmb() to ensure the order of the available
> ring entry read and avail_idx read.
>
> Improve vhost_get_avail_idx() so that smp_rmb() is executed when
> the avail_idx is advanced. With it, the callers needn't to worry
> about the memory barrier.
>
> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Previous patches are ok. This one I feel needs more work -
first more code such as sanity checking should go into
this function, second there's actually a difference
between comparing to last_avail_idx and just comparing
to the previous value of avail_idx.
I will pick patches 1-2 and post a cleanup on top so you can
take a look, ok?
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 75 +++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 32686c79c41d..e6882f4f6ce2 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -1290,10 +1290,28 @@ static void vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
> mutex_unlock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
> }
>
> -static inline int vhost_get_avail_idx(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> - __virtio16 *idx)
> +static inline int vhost_get_avail_idx(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> {
> - return vhost_get_avail(vq, *idx, &vq->avail->idx);
> + __virtio16 avail_idx;
> + int r;
> +
> + r = vhost_get_avail(vq, avail_idx, &vq->avail->idx);
> + if (unlikely(r)) {
> + vq_err(vq, "Failed to access avail idx at %p\n",
> + &vq->avail->idx);
> + return r;
> + }
> +
> + vq->avail_idx = vhost16_to_cpu(vq, avail_idx);
> + if (vq->avail_idx != vq->last_avail_idx) {
> + /* Ensure the available ring entry read happens
> + * before the avail_idx read when the avail_idx
> + * is advanced.
> + */
> + smp_rmb();
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static inline int vhost_get_avail_head(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> @@ -2499,7 +2517,6 @@ int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> struct vring_desc desc;
> unsigned int i, head, found = 0;
> u16 last_avail_idx;
> - __virtio16 avail_idx;
> __virtio16 ring_head;
> int ret, access;
>
> @@ -2507,12 +2524,8 @@ int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> last_avail_idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
>
> if (vq->avail_idx == vq->last_avail_idx) {
> - if (unlikely(vhost_get_avail_idx(vq, &avail_idx))) {
> - vq_err(vq, "Failed to access avail idx at %p\n",
> - &vq->avail->idx);
> + if (unlikely(vhost_get_avail_idx(vq)))
> return -EFAULT;
> - }
> - vq->avail_idx = vhost16_to_cpu(vq, avail_idx);
>
> if (unlikely((u16)(vq->avail_idx - last_avail_idx) > vq->num)) {
> vq_err(vq, "Guest moved used index from %u to %u",
> @@ -2525,11 +2538,6 @@ int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> */
> if (vq->avail_idx == last_avail_idx)
> return vq->num;
> -
> - /* Only get avail ring entries after they have been
> - * exposed by guest.
> - */
> - smp_rmb();
> }
>
> /* Grab the next descriptor number they're advertising, and increment
> @@ -2790,35 +2798,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_add_used_and_signal_n);
> /* return true if we're sure that avaiable ring is empty */
> bool vhost_vq_avail_empty(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> {
> - __virtio16 avail_idx;
> - int r;
> -
> if (vq->avail_idx != vq->last_avail_idx)
> return false;
>
> - r = vhost_get_avail_idx(vq, &avail_idx);
> - if (unlikely(r))
> - return false;
> -
> - vq->avail_idx = vhost16_to_cpu(vq, avail_idx);
> - if (vq->avail_idx != vq->last_avail_idx) {
> - /* Since we have updated avail_idx, the following
> - * call to vhost_get_vq_desc() will read available
> - * ring entries. Make sure that read happens after
> - * the avail_idx read.
> - */
> - smp_rmb();
> + if (unlikely(vhost_get_avail_idx(vq)))
> return false;
> - }
>
> - return true;
> + return vq->avail_idx == vq->last_avail_idx;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_vq_avail_empty);
>
> /* OK, now we need to know about added descriptors. */
> bool vhost_enable_notify(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> {
> - __virtio16 avail_idx;
> int r;
>
> if (!(vq->used_flags & VRING_USED_F_NO_NOTIFY))
> @@ -2842,25 +2834,10 @@ bool vhost_enable_notify(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> /* They could have slipped one in as we were doing that: make
> * sure it's written, then check again. */
> smp_mb();
> - r = vhost_get_avail_idx(vq, &avail_idx);
> - if (r) {
> - vq_err(vq, "Failed to check avail idx at %p: %d\n",
> - &vq->avail->idx, r);
> + if (unlikely(vhost_get_avail_idx(vq)))
> return false;
> - }
> -
> - vq->avail_idx = vhost16_to_cpu(vq, avail_idx);
> - if (vq->avail_idx != vq->last_avail_idx) {
> - /* Since we have updated avail_idx, the following
> - * call to vhost_get_vq_desc() will read available
> - * ring entries. Make sure that read happens after
> - * the avail_idx read.
> - */
> - smp_rmb();
> - return true;
> - }
>
> - return false;
> + return vq->avail_idx != vq->last_avail_idx;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_enable_notify);
>
> --
> 2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-28 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-28 0:21 [PATCH v3 0/3] vhost: Fix stale available ring entries Gavin Shan
2024-03-28 0:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] vhost: Add smp_rmb() in vhost_vq_avail_empty() Gavin Shan
2024-03-28 9:47 ` Stefano Garzarella
2024-03-28 0:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] vhost: Add smp_rmb() in vhost_enable_notify() Gavin Shan
2024-03-28 9:48 ` Stefano Garzarella
2024-03-28 0:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] vhost: Improve vhost_get_avail_idx() with smp_rmb() Gavin Shan
2024-03-28 3:54 ` Jason Wang
2024-03-28 9:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2024-03-30 9:02 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-08 4:15 ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-08 7:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-04-08 7:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-04-22 20:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-04-23 3:36 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240328052814-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yihyu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.