From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F90F64F for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711850655; cv=none; b=XeJdraRvr95BVlzRAzJBCxUGwDzZnE7VzVO/sZrk2eSF6mwIuNVJzp4lxglJx5BzcSeZZB2RWqLj2wSzG0zztAQzfcjEZMFXPTOb/OfnrsNQAmn18svl7mq+QQBqTepGdUUHdJGrKlnd7rVliOz4dNSnDJyuh80MzpyW0BHEPLc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711850655; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WXYqaP2ySnOoLYcaLi/6XttihdhjYbxiZEVcfE8PIO8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OWGRm3+K6lSRtQJf7Q7lUVD5Ynn8JrZR3VYizw92rKo+ZHwxf5Qd0CjOSt5yN+h/7H5fG8os/3T/LEpE4PskNP1tdmxSdWo0hCEp/clvzlJ8lOnf9TTHGvh2XvqYG4OWHv0YS7ip4rCQsmqY08Tnjsak8tGwDHOigk33AH6+m/A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=GVhhK6TJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="GVhhK6TJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711850653; x=1743386653; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=WXYqaP2ySnOoLYcaLi/6XttihdhjYbxiZEVcfE8PIO8=; b=GVhhK6TJmkOJPWFLyvWVTDbeKDjVvt5CSmKJX5Am6/azTFsh+uU7B+/R k5D6ZWsNMcAh5EWjOfwQ1oss9nM0VzEouOrfSD4es4uLDL1MOq0b9Yv0z Pe7MyQiDfIv5x47TETbxIbS6HNz/6dKjdSItSB50+CbyO0cEe+RG4dw43 o0I1yvDugdu/AfROTyX67L59yUsCQO3RLYgJA3DlZk2P1ngGpVK613mjq 8q87DXFjjsDJEdsDfpBq4mytzBkWc5rZ9IqPA21i/Qt9BmQLuvqUO7VQo wzUy5KvADAelQIagJ0M802OpEfzJ+vlyNAc3mW0qDd6b6gx+ZNlvkyGEl Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: slkL2i9sRKmgV0xYq0k+zQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: jddB4vYaS9O6RpIexUfx4A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11029"; a="17559977" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,169,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="17559977" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Mar 2024 19:04:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,169,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="21852090" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 3d808bfd2502) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2024 19:04:10 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 3d808bfd2502 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rqkYK-0000gj-1C; Sun, 31 Mar 2024 02:04:08 +0000 Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 10:03:09 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jiqian Chen Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC KERNEL PATCH v5 2/3] xen/pvh: Setup gsi for passthrough device Message-ID: <202403310932.nmHEif4W-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240328065646.354782-3-Jiqian.Chen@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240328065646.354782-3-Jiqian.Chen@amd.com> Hi Jiqian, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on xen-tip/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on pci/next pci/for-linus rafael-pm/linux-next linus/master v6.9-rc1 next-20240328] [cannot apply to tip/x86/core rafael-pm/acpi-bus rafael-pm/devprop] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jiqian-Chen/xen-pci-Add-xen_reset_device_state-function/20240328-145956 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git linux-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328065646.354782-3-Jiqian.Chen%40amd.com patch subject: [RFC KERNEL PATCH v5 2/3] xen/pvh: Setup gsi for passthrough device config: arm64-randconfig-001-20240331 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240331/202403310932.nmHEif4W-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240331/202403310932.nmHEif4W-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403310932.nmHEif4W-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c:23: include/xen/acpi.h: In function 'xen_acpi_sleep_register': >> include/xen/acpi.h:63:58: error: macro "acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep" requires 3 arguments, but only 1 given 63 | &xen_acpi_notify_hypervisor_sleep); | ^ In file included from include/xen/acpi.h:41: include/linux/acpi.h:1121: note: macro "acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep" defined here 1121 | #define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func, pm1a_ctrl, pm1b_ctrl) do { } while (0) | >> include/xen/acpi.h:62:17: error: 'acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'acpi_os_enter_sleep'? 62 | acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep( | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | acpi_os_enter_sleep include/xen/acpi.h:62:17: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in >> include/xen/acpi.h:64:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_os_set_prepare_extended_sleep'; did you mean 'acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 64 | acpi_os_set_prepare_extended_sleep( | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep include/xen/acpi.h:67:17: error: 'acpi_suspend_lowlevel' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'xen_acpi_suspend_lowlevel'? 67 | acpi_suspend_lowlevel = xen_acpi_suspend_lowlevel; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | xen_acpi_suspend_lowlevel cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep +63 include/xen/acpi.h 068e0dc7b7c1db Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2013-05-14 58 268a207563f933 Liu Jinsong 2013-02-14 59 static inline void xen_acpi_sleep_register(void) 268a207563f933 Liu Jinsong 2013-02-14 60 { 068e0dc7b7c1db Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2013-05-14 61 if (xen_initial_domain()) { 268a207563f933 Liu Jinsong 2013-02-14 @62 acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep( be6b25d15f5e67 Ben Guthro 2013-07-30 @63 &xen_acpi_notify_hypervisor_sleep); be6b25d15f5e67 Ben Guthro 2013-07-30 @64 acpi_os_set_prepare_extended_sleep( be6b25d15f5e67 Ben Guthro 2013-07-30 65 &xen_acpi_notify_hypervisor_extended_sleep); 068e0dc7b7c1db Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2013-05-14 66 068e0dc7b7c1db Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2013-05-14 67 acpi_suspend_lowlevel = xen_acpi_suspend_lowlevel; 068e0dc7b7c1db Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2013-05-14 68 } 268a207563f933 Liu Jinsong 2013-02-14 69 } 818bdd39dbd468 Jiqian Chen 2024-03-28 70 int xen_pvh_passthrough_gsi(struct pci_dev *dev); 268a207563f933 Liu Jinsong 2013-02-14 71 #else 268a207563f933 Liu Jinsong 2013-02-14 72 static inline void xen_acpi_sleep_register(void) 268a207563f933 Liu Jinsong 2013-02-14 73 { 268a207563f933 Liu Jinsong 2013-02-14 74 } 818bdd39dbd468 Jiqian Chen 2024-03-28 75 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki