From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,shuah@kernel.org,kaleshsingh@google.com,jhubbard@nvidia.com,anshuman.khandual@arm.com,dev.jain@arm.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + selftests-mm-mremap_test-optimize-execution-time-from-minutes-to-seconds-using-chunkwise-memcmp.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2024 11:59:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240401185941.9C279C43390@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: selftests/mm: mremap_test: optimize execution time from minutes to seconds using chunkwise memcmp
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
selftests-mm-mremap_test-optimize-execution-time-from-minutes-to-seconds-using-chunkwise-memcmp.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/selftests-mm-mremap_test-optimize-execution-time-from-minutes-to-seconds-using-chunkwise-memcmp.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Subject: selftests/mm: mremap_test: optimize execution time from minutes to seconds using chunkwise memcmp
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 23:05:56 +0530
Mismatch index is currently being checked by a brute force iteration over
the buffer. Instead, break the comparison into O(sqrt(n)) number of
chunks, with the chunk size of this order only, where n is the size of the
buffer. Do a brute-force iteration to print to stdout only when the
highly optimized memcmp() library function returns a mismatch in the
chunk. The time complexity of this algorithm is O(sqrt(n)) * t, where t
is the time taken by memcmp(); for our test conditions, it is safe to
assume t to be small.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240330173557.2697684-3-dev.jain@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c~selftests-mm-mremap_test-optimize-execution-time-from-minutes-to-seconds-using-chunkwise-memcmp
+++ a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mremap_test.c
@@ -70,6 +70,27 @@ enum {
.expect_failure = should_fail \
}
+/* compute square root using binary search */
+static unsigned long get_sqrt(unsigned long val)
+{
+ unsigned long low = 1;
+
+ /* assuming rand_size is less than 1TB */
+ unsigned long high = (1UL << 20);
+
+ while (low <= high) {
+ unsigned long mid = low + (high - low) / 2;
+ unsigned long temp = mid * mid;
+
+ if (temp == val)
+ return mid;
+ if (temp < val)
+ low = mid + 1;
+ high = mid - 1;
+ }
+ return low;
+}
+
/*
* Returns false if the requested remap region overlaps with an
* existing mapping (e.g text, stack) else returns true.
@@ -355,14 +376,14 @@ out:
/* Returns the time taken for the remap on success else returns -1. */
static long long remap_region(struct config c, unsigned int threshold_mb,
- unsigned int pattern_seed, char *rand_addr)
+ char *rand_addr)
{
void *addr, *src_addr, *dest_addr, *dest_preamble_addr;
- int d;
- unsigned long long t;
+ unsigned long long t, d;
struct timespec t_start = {0, 0}, t_end = {0, 0};
long long start_ns, end_ns, align_mask, ret, offset;
unsigned long long threshold;
+ unsigned long num_chunks;
if (threshold_mb == VALIDATION_NO_THRESHOLD)
threshold = c.region_size;
@@ -430,15 +451,42 @@ static long long remap_region(struct con
goto clean_up_dest_preamble;
}
- /* Verify byte pattern after remapping */
- srand(pattern_seed);
- for (t = 0; t < threshold; t++) {
- char c = (char) rand();
+ /*
+ * Verify byte pattern after remapping. Employ an algorithm with a
+ * square root time complexity in threshold: divide the range into
+ * chunks, if memcmp() returns non-zero, only then perform an
+ * iteration in that chunk to find the mismatch index.
+ */
+ num_chunks = get_sqrt(threshold);
+ for (unsigned long i = 0; i < num_chunks; ++i) {
+ size_t chunk_size = threshold / num_chunks;
+ unsigned long shift = i * chunk_size;
+
+ if (!memcmp(dest_addr + shift, rand_addr + shift, chunk_size))
+ continue;
+
+ /* brute force iteration only over mismatch segment */
+ for (t = shift; t < shift + chunk_size; ++t) {
+ if (((char *) dest_addr)[t] != rand_addr[t]) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Data after remap doesn't match at offset %llu\n",
+ t);
+ ksft_print_msg("Expected: %#x\t Got: %#x\n", rand_addr[t] & 0xff,
+ ((char *) dest_addr)[t] & 0xff);
+ ret = -1;
+ goto clean_up_dest;
+ }
+ }
+ }
- if (((char *) dest_addr)[t] != c) {
+ /*
+ * if threshold is not divisible by num_chunks, then check the
+ * last chunk
+ */
+ for (t = num_chunks * (threshold / num_chunks); t < threshold; ++t) {
+ if (((char *) dest_addr)[t] != rand_addr[t]) {
ksft_print_msg("Data after remap doesn't match at offset %llu\n",
- t);
- ksft_print_msg("Expected: %#x\t Got: %#x\n", c & 0xff,
+ t);
+ ksft_print_msg("Expected: %#x\t Got: %#x\n", rand_addr[t] & 0xff,
((char *) dest_addr)[t] & 0xff);
ret = -1;
goto clean_up_dest;
@@ -446,22 +494,44 @@ static long long remap_region(struct con
}
/* Verify the dest preamble byte pattern after remapping */
- if (c.dest_preamble_size) {
- srand(pattern_seed);
- for (d = 0; d < c.dest_preamble_size; d++) {
- char c = (char) rand();
-
- if (((char *) dest_preamble_addr)[d] != c) {
- ksft_print_msg("Preamble data after remap doesn't match at offset %d\n",
- d);
- ksft_print_msg("Expected: %#x\t Got: %#x\n", c & 0xff,
- ((char *) dest_preamble_addr)[d] & 0xff);
+ if (!c.dest_preamble_size)
+ goto no_preamble;
+
+ num_chunks = get_sqrt(c.dest_preamble_size);
+
+ for (unsigned long i = 0; i < num_chunks; ++i) {
+ size_t chunk_size = c.dest_preamble_size / num_chunks;
+ unsigned long shift = i * chunk_size;
+
+ if (!memcmp(dest_preamble_addr + shift, rand_addr + shift,
+ chunk_size))
+ continue;
+
+ /* brute force iteration only over mismatched segment */
+ for (d = shift; d < shift + chunk_size; ++d) {
+ if (((char *) dest_preamble_addr)[d] != rand_addr[d]) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Preamble data after remap doesn't match at offset %llu\n",
+ d);
+ ksft_print_msg("Expected: %#x\t Got: %#x\n", rand_addr[d] & 0xff,
+ ((char *) dest_preamble_addr)[d] & 0xff);
ret = -1;
goto clean_up_dest;
}
}
}
+ for (d = num_chunks * (c.dest_preamble_size / num_chunks); d < c.dest_preamble_size; ++d) {
+ if (((char *) dest_preamble_addr)[d] != rand_addr[d]) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Preamble data after remap doesn't match at offset %llu\n",
+ d);
+ ksft_print_msg("Expected: %#x\t Got: %#x\n", rand_addr[d] & 0xff,
+ ((char *) dest_preamble_addr)[d] & 0xff);
+ ret = -1;
+ goto clean_up_dest;
+ }
+ }
+
+no_preamble:
start_ns = t_start.tv_sec * NS_PER_SEC + t_start.tv_nsec;
end_ns = t_end.tv_sec * NS_PER_SEC + t_end.tv_nsec;
ret = end_ns - start_ns;
@@ -563,7 +633,7 @@ static void run_mremap_test_case(struct
unsigned int pattern_seed, char *rand_addr)
{
long long remap_time = remap_region(test_case.config, threshold_mb,
- pattern_seed, rand_addr);
+ rand_addr);
if (remap_time < 0) {
if (test_case.expect_failure)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from dev.jain@arm.com are
selftests-mm-virtual_address_range-switch-to-ksft_exit_fail_msg.patch
selftests-mm-confirm-va-exhaustion-without-reliance-on-correctness-of-mmap.patch
selftests-mm-confirm-va-exhaustion-without-reliance-on-correctness-of-mmap-v2.patch
selftests-mm-parse-vma-range-in-one-go.patch
selftests-mm-mremap_test-optimize-using-pre-filled-random-array-and-memcpy.patch
selftests-mm-mremap_test-optimize-execution-time-from-minutes-to-seconds-using-chunkwise-memcmp.patch
selftests-mm-mremap_test-use-sscanf-to-parse-proc-self-maps.patch
reply other threads:[~2024-04-01 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240401185941.9C279C43390@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.