All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Verify calling core kfuncs from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYCALL
Date: Fri,  5 Apr 2024 09:30:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240405143041.632519-3-void@manifault.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240405143041.632519-1-void@manifault.com>

Now that we can call some kfuncs from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL progs, let's
add some selftests that verify as much. As a bonus, let's also verify
that we can't call the progs from raw tracepoints. Do do this, we add a
new selftest suite called verifier_kfunc_prog_types.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 .../prog_tests/verifier_kfunc_prog_types.c    |  11 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/cgrp_kfunc_common.h   |   2 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h   |   2 +-
 .../bpf/progs/verifier_kfunc_prog_types.c     | 119 ++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_kfunc_prog_types.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_kfunc_prog_types.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_kfunc_prog_types.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_kfunc_prog_types.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3918ecc2ee91
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier_kfunc_prog_types.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+
+#include "verifier_kfunc_prog_types.skel.h"
+
+void test_verifier_kfunc_prog_types(void)
+{
+	RUN_TESTS(verifier_kfunc_prog_types);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cgrp_kfunc_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cgrp_kfunc_common.h
index 22914a70db54..73ba32e9a693 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cgrp_kfunc_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cgrp_kfunc_common.h
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ struct __cgrps_kfunc_map_value {
 	struct cgroup __kptr * cgrp;
 };
 
-struct hash_map {
+struct {
 	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
 	__type(key, int);
 	__type(value, struct __cgrps_kfunc_map_value);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h
index 41f2d44f49cb..6720c4b5be41 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value {
 	struct task_struct __kptr * task;
 };
 
-struct hash_map {
+struct {
 	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
 	__type(key, int);
 	__type(value, struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_kfunc_prog_types.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_kfunc_prog_types.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b7f17c6b3443
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_kfunc_prog_types.c
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "cgrp_kfunc_common.h"
+#include "cpumask_common.h"
+#include "task_kfunc_common.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+/***************
+ * Task kfuncs *
+ ***************/
+
+static inline void task_kfunc_load_test(void)
+{
+	struct task_struct *current, *ref_1, *ref_2;
+
+	current = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
+	ref_1 = bpf_task_from_pid(current->pid);
+	if (!ref_1)
+		return;
+
+	ref_2 = bpf_task_acquire(ref_1);
+	if (ref_2)
+		bpf_task_release(ref_2);
+	bpf_task_release(ref_1);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__failure __msg("calling kernel function")
+int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_raw_tp)
+{
+	task_kfunc_load_test();
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall") __success
+int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_syscall)
+{
+	task_kfunc_load_test();
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*****************
+ * cgroup kfuncs *
+ *****************/
+
+static inline void cgrp_kfunc_load_test(void)
+{
+	struct cgroup *cgrp, *ref;
+
+	cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(0);
+	if (!cgrp)
+		return;
+
+	ref = bpf_cgroup_acquire(cgrp);
+	if (!ref) {
+		bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	bpf_cgroup_release(ref);
+	bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__failure __msg("calling kernel function")
+int BPF_PROG(cgrp_kfunc_raw_tp)
+{
+	cgrp_kfunc_load_test();
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall") __success
+int BPF_PROG(cgrp_kfunc_syscall)
+{
+	cgrp_kfunc_load_test();
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/******************
+ * cpumask kfuncs *
+ ******************/
+
+static inline void cpumask_kfunc_load_test(void)
+{
+	struct bpf_cpumask *alloc, *ref;
+
+	alloc = bpf_cpumask_create();
+	if (!alloc)
+		return;
+
+	ref = bpf_cpumask_acquire(alloc);
+	bpf_cpumask_set_cpu(0, alloc);
+	bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(0, (const struct cpumask *)ref);
+
+	bpf_cpumask_release(ref);
+	bpf_cpumask_release(alloc);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__failure __msg("calling kernel function")
+int BPF_PROG(cpumask_kfunc_raw_tp)
+{
+	cpumask_kfunc_load_test();
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall") __success
+int BPF_PROG(cpumask_kfunc_syscall)
+{
+	cpumask_kfunc_load_test();
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.44.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-05 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-05 14:30 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf: Allow invoking kfuncs from BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL progs David Vernet
2024-04-05 14:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] " David Vernet
2024-04-05 14:30 ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-04-05 18:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240405143041.632519-3-void@manifault.com \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.