From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3] mm/memblock: remove empty dummy entry
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 12:37:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240408123721.k224aimkcvob3ddi@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZhOEP-66xyQgA_Nz@kernel.org>
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 08:44:31AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 01:58:21AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>> The dummy entry is introduced in the initial implementation of lmb in
>> commit 7c8c6b9776fb ("powerpc: Merge lmb.c and make MM initialization
>> use it.").
>>
>> As the comment says the empty dummy entry is to simplify the code.
>>
>> /* Create a dummy zero size LMB which will get coalesced away later.
>> * This simplifies the lmb_add() code below...
>> */
>>
>> While current code is reimplemented by Tejun in commit 784656f9c680
>> ("memblock: Reimplement memblock_add_region()"). This empty dummy entry
>> seems not benefit the code any more.
>>
>> Let's remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
>> CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>> CC: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
>>
>> ---
>> v2: remove cnt initialization to 0 and keep special case for empty array
>> v3: reset cnt to 0 in memblock test
>> ---
>> mm/memblock.c | 7 ++-----
>> tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 8 ++++----
>> tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
>> index d09136e040d3..98d25689cf10 100644
>> --- a/mm/memblock.c
>> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
>> @@ -114,12 +114,10 @@ static struct memblock_region memblock_physmem_init_regions[INIT_PHYSMEM_REGIONS
>>
>> struct memblock memblock __initdata_memblock = {
>> .memory.regions = memblock_memory_init_regions,
>> - .memory.cnt = 1, /* empty dummy entry */
>> .memory.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS,
>> .memory.name = "memory",
>>
>> .reserved.regions = memblock_reserved_init_regions,
>> - .reserved.cnt = 1, /* empty dummy entry */
>> .reserved.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS,
>> .reserved.name = "reserved",
>>
>> @@ -130,7 +128,6 @@ struct memblock memblock __initdata_memblock = {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
>> struct memblock_type physmem = {
>> .regions = memblock_physmem_init_regions,
>> - .cnt = 1, /* empty dummy entry */
>> .max = INIT_PHYSMEM_REGIONS,
>> .name = "physmem",
>> };
>> @@ -356,7 +353,6 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct memblock_type *type, u
>> /* Special case for empty arrays */
>> if (type->cnt == 0) {
>> WARN_ON(type->total_size != 0);
>> - type->cnt = 1;
>
>Sorry if I wasn't clear, I meant to keep special case only in
>memblock_add_range. Here I think
>
> WARN_ON(type->cnt == 0 && type->total_size != 0);
>
>should be enough.
>
You mean change like this?
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index d09136e040d3..b75b835f99d1 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -352,16 +352,7 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct memblock_type *type, u
memmove(&type->regions[r], &type->regions[r + 1],
(type->cnt - (r + 1)) * sizeof(type->regions[r]));
type->cnt--;
-
- /* Special case for empty arrays */
- if (type->cnt == 0) {
- WARN_ON(type->total_size != 0);
- type->cnt = 1;
- type->regions[0].base = 0;
- type->regions[0].size = 0;
- type->regions[0].flags = 0;
- memblock_set_region_node(&type->regions[0], MAX_NUMNODES);
- }
+ WARN_ON(type->cnt == 0 && type->total_size != 0);
}
#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
This doesn't work, since on removing the last region, memmove would take no
effect and left regions[0].base .size .flags not changed.
So we need to keep the special handling here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-05 1:58 [Patch v3] mm/memblock: remove empty dummy entry Wei Yang
2024-04-08 5:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-08 12:37 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2024-04-09 5:02 ` Mike Rapoport
[not found] ` <8d6205d4-18fb-4e98-97e6-db226dcf48f3@roeck-us.net>
2024-06-21 1:07 ` Wei Yang
2024-06-21 2:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-21 23:06 ` Wei Yang
[not found] ` <2113ef59-0efd-4de2-83f7-f5940ce40fca@roeck-us.net>
2024-06-22 18:16 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-06-23 0:31 ` Wei Yang
2024-06-21 1:11 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240408123721.k224aimkcvob3ddi@master \
--to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.