From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32ADBBE6F for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 05:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=145.40.73.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712555058; cv=none; b=lZH+gQDlF+iSy3gaSDEx+3xICU8QNsYBFQtkG73PWD+aeXmnE38aVzCazzzb8zkXzFmVDtfKrqYR7YsSZw2hHEUkjJU1/xIymbX5xkD+wUsPs6MrGhFm/5jJnfwNQG+doUCKFSSHj19RK6wTT3J5chFEebtBrKMJbN9poLbvNoc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712555058; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vMTO+JCxJ/pC8pUOQVFfrJmUCn0gHKZBHp2mN8vrUkY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tOrGqPd0fnPzRKjpkxK0gvz9/oruEwwtn0/fZu0M3SIA/Z5vOVWM7CZNfRRlth1Xb1/6cyuJVYN52LuS3jpzUz70RBq8FvkJ9ruVjfsium3C2EPo6fyod2TTvZ/AtIOrwcZJU8D8Uk2/749bJlgFHHAGkUTF8uJyAEjmEwEqrac= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=1yWZ8c3a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=145.40.73.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="1yWZ8c3a" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD655CE0C61; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 05:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D56FC433F1; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 05:44:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1712555054; bh=vMTO+JCxJ/pC8pUOQVFfrJmUCn0gHKZBHp2mN8vrUkY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=1yWZ8c3afHE2SqsjmwsiwlagPW2l0wHd6orMPdWrLRaIm4oevC51UhVuVWvEMsD78 HMK8Rnmq2St49ROmoMrJe9eqkhIJClsPRUAFWerMk3yzPPSzyhGZ5mpq7FhIV13v0r NAYbYrf+vMkX3iWja7ouU1FF3yCxfW+KqwaKWPbE= Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 07:44:10 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Jiri Slaby Cc: Michael Ellerman , Finn Thain , Andy Shevchenko , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , "Naveen N. Rao" , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood Message-ID: <2024040843-plug-thirstily-e478@gregkh> References: <8f234f26-d5e3-66ed-ab0c-86d3c9852b4a@linux-m68k.org> <87y19s7bk6.fsf@mail.lhotse> <4bddf8ec-97f1-07f6-9c0a-523c102c0a1b@linux-m68k.org> <87v84sbexv.fsf@mail.lhotse> <3adf561b-2d6b-47be-8fca-2a26ee738670@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3adf561b-2d6b-47be-8fca-2a26ee738670@kernel.org> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:37:22AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 08. 04. 24, 7:32, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > On 08. 04. 24, 7:29, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > Many maintainers won't drop Cc: tags if they are there in the submitted > > > patch. So I agree with Andy that we should encourage folks not to add > > > them in the first place. > > > > But fix the docs first. > > > > I am personally not biased to any variant (as in: I don't care where CCs > > live in a patch). > > OTOH, as a submitter, it's a major PITA to carry CCs in notes (to have those > under the --- line). Esp. when I have patches in a queue for years. Agreed, let's keep them where they are in the signed-off-by area, it's not hurting or harming anything to have them there. thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C8B4C67861 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 05:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=1yWZ8c3a; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VCdMx4bt6z3vYy for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 15:45:01 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=1yWZ8c3a; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=145.40.73.55; helo=sin.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VCdM84SThz3bfS for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 15:44:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD655CE0C61; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 05:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D56FC433F1; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 05:44:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1712555054; bh=vMTO+JCxJ/pC8pUOQVFfrJmUCn0gHKZBHp2mN8vrUkY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=1yWZ8c3afHE2SqsjmwsiwlagPW2l0wHd6orMPdWrLRaIm4oevC51UhVuVWvEMsD78 HMK8Rnmq2St49ROmoMrJe9eqkhIJClsPRUAFWerMk3yzPPSzyhGZ5mpq7FhIV13v0r NAYbYrf+vMkX3iWja7ouU1FF3yCxfW+KqwaKWPbE= Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 07:44:10 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood Message-ID: <2024040843-plug-thirstily-e478@gregkh> References: <8f234f26-d5e3-66ed-ab0c-86d3c9852b4a@linux-m68k.org> <87y19s7bk6.fsf@mail.lhotse> <4bddf8ec-97f1-07f6-9c0a-523c102c0a1b@linux-m68k.org> <87v84sbexv.fsf@mail.lhotse> <3adf561b-2d6b-47be-8fca-2a26ee738670@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3adf561b-2d6b-47be-8fca-2a26ee738670@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Finn Thain , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Andy Shevchenko , Nicholas Piggin , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, "Naveen N. Rao" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:37:22AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 08. 04. 24, 7:32, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > On 08. 04. 24, 7:29, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > Many maintainers won't drop Cc: tags if they are there in the submitted > > > patch. So I agree with Andy that we should encourage folks not to add > > > them in the first place. > > > > But fix the docs first. > > > > I am personally not biased to any variant (as in: I don't care where CCs > > live in a patch). > > OTOH, as a submitter, it's a major PITA to carry CCs in notes (to have those > under the --- line). Esp. when I have patches in a queue for years. Agreed, let's keep them where they are in the signed-off-by area, it's not hurting or harming anything to have them there. thanks, greg k-h