From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 10/11] selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_rb_root arrays.
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 17:41:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240410004150.2917641-11-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240410004150.2917641-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>
Make sure global arrays of bpf_rb_root work correctly.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rbtree.c | 23 +++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rbtree.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rbtree.c
index e9300c96607d..399d61b8a9a4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rbtree.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/rbtree.c
@@ -53,6 +53,27 @@ static void test_rbtree_add_and_remove(void)
rbtree__destroy(skel);
}
+static void test_rbtree_add_and_remove_array(void)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts,
+ .data_in = &pkt_v4,
+ .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
+ .repeat = 1,
+ );
+ struct rbtree *skel;
+ int ret;
+
+ skel = rbtree__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "rbtree__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.rbtree_add_and_remove_array), &opts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "rbtree_add_and_remove_array");
+ ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "rbtree_add_and_remove_array retval");
+
+ rbtree__destroy(skel);
+}
+
static void test_rbtree_first_and_remove(void)
{
LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts,
@@ -106,6 +127,8 @@ void test_rbtree_success(void)
test_rbtree_add_nodes();
if (test__start_subtest("rbtree_add_and_remove"))
test_rbtree_add_and_remove();
+ if (test__start_subtest("rbtree_add_and_remove_array"))
+ test_rbtree_add_and_remove_array();
if (test__start_subtest("rbtree_first_and_remove"))
test_rbtree_first_and_remove();
if (test__start_subtest("rbtree_api_release_aliasing"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c
index b09f4fffe57c..6bf7285944d6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ long first_data[2] = {-1, -1};
#define private(name) SEC(".data." #name) __hidden __attribute__((aligned(8)))
private(A) struct bpf_spin_lock glock;
private(A) struct bpf_rb_root groot __contains(node_data, node);
+private(A) struct bpf_rb_root groot_array[2] __contains(node_data, node);
+private(A) struct bpf_rb_root groot_array_one[1] __contains(node_data, node);
static bool less(struct bpf_rb_node *a, const struct bpf_rb_node *b)
{
@@ -109,6 +111,67 @@ long rbtree_add_and_remove(void *ctx)
return 1;
}
+SEC("tc")
+long rbtree_add_and_remove_array(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct bpf_rb_node *res1 = NULL, *res2 = NULL, *res3 = NULL;
+ struct node_data *nodes[3][2] = {{NULL, NULL}, {NULL, NULL}, {NULL, NULL}};
+ struct node_data *n;
+ long k1 = -1, k2 = -1, k3 = -1;
+ int i, j;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+ for (j = 0; j < 2; j++) {
+ nodes[i][j] = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*nodes[i][j]));
+ if (!nodes[i][j])
+ goto err_out;
+ nodes[i][j]->key = i * 2 + j;
+ }
+ }
+
+ bpf_spin_lock(&glock);
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
+ for (j = 0; j < 2; j++)
+ bpf_rbtree_add(&groot_array[i], &nodes[i][j]->node, less);
+ for (j = 0; j < 2; j++)
+ bpf_rbtree_add(&groot_array_one[0], &nodes[2][j]->node, less);
+ res1 = bpf_rbtree_remove(&groot_array[0], &nodes[0][0]->node);
+ res2 = bpf_rbtree_remove(&groot_array[1], &nodes[1][0]->node);
+ res3 = bpf_rbtree_remove(&groot_array_one[0], &nodes[2][0]->node);
+ bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);
+
+ if (res1) {
+ n = container_of(res1, struct node_data, node);
+ k1 = n->key;
+ bpf_obj_drop(n);
+ }
+ if (res2) {
+ n = container_of(res2, struct node_data, node);
+ k2 = n->key;
+ bpf_obj_drop(n);
+ }
+ if (res3) {
+ n = container_of(res3, struct node_data, node);
+ k3 = n->key;
+ bpf_obj_drop(n);
+ }
+ if (k1 != 0 || k2 != 2)
+ return 2;
+ if (k3 != 4)
+ return 3;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_out:
+ for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+ for (j = 0; j < 2; j++) {
+ if (nodes[i][j])
+ bpf_obj_drop(nodes[i][j]);
+ }
+ }
+ return 1;
+}
+
SEC("tc")
long rbtree_first_and_remove(void *ctx)
{
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-10 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-10 0:41 [PATCH bpf-next 00/11] Enable BPF programs to declare arrays of kptr, bpf_rb_root, and bpf_list_head Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/11] bpf: Remove unnecessary checks on the offset of btf_field Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:12 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/11] bpf: Remove unnecessary call to btf_field_type_size() Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:12 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/11] bpf: Add nelems to struct btf_field_info and btf_field Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/11] bpf: check_map_kptr_access() compute the offset from the reg state Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 4:00 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/11] bpf: initialize/free array of btf_field(s) Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 3:56 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-12 15:32 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 17:00 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/11] bpf: Find btf_field with the knowledge of arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:14 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 2:00 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/11] bpf: check_map_access() " Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-11 22:14 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 16:32 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-12 19:08 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-12 19:29 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-12 19:50 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/11] bpf: Enable and verify btf_field arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/11] selftests/bpf: Test global kptr arrays Kui-Feng Lee
2024-04-10 0:41 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2024-04-10 0:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/11] selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_list_head arrays Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240410004150.2917641-11-thinker.li@gmail.com \
--to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.