From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
"open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] xfs: fix error returns from xfs_bmapi_write
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 06:02:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240410040240.GB1883@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240409231917.GP6390@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:19:17PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hmm. So I think the answer to my questions earlier is that with the
> series applied, ENOSR should never leak out because bmapi_write calls
> will always do the piece that the caller asked for, right?
Almost. With the whole series ENOSR goes away again (but then again
I'm a bit skeptical if it opens new unknown cans of worms, see the
cover letter).
With just this patch it will leak to user space if we ever hit a case
where we completely mishandled this error before. Which we've not
observed, but which isn't entirely impossible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-10 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-08 14:54 RFC: extended version of the xfs_bmapi_write retval fix Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: fix error returns from xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-10 4:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: remove the unusued tmp_logflags variable in xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: lifr a xfs_valid_startblock into xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: don't open code XFS_FILBLKS_MIN in xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: pass the actual offset and len to allocate to xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-10 4:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: remove the xfs_iext_peek_prev_extent call in xfs_bmapi_allocate Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: fix xfs_bmap_add_extent_delay_real for partial conversions Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-10 4:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-08 14:54 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: do not allocate the entire delalloc extent in xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 23:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-10 4:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240410040240.GB1883@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.