From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux@roeck-us.net, o.rempel@pengutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: dev_addr_lists: move locking out of init/exit in kunit
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:32:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240411183222.433713-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
We lock and unlock rtnl in init/exit for convenience,
but it started causing problems if the exit is handled
by a different thread. To avoid having to futz with
disabling locking assertions move the locking into
the test cases. We don't use ASSERTs so it should
be safe.
============= dev-addr-list-test (6 subtests) ==============
[PASSED] dev_addr_test_basic
[PASSED] dev_addr_test_sync_one
[PASSED] dev_addr_test_add_del
[PASSED] dev_addr_test_del_main
[PASSED] dev_addr_test_add_set
[PASSED] dev_addr_test_add_excl
=============== [PASSED] dev-addr-list-test ================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240403131936.787234-7-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: linux@roeck-us.net
CC: o.rempel@pengutronix.de
---
net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
index 4dbd0dc6aea2..8e1dba825e94 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ static int dev_addr_test_init(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Can't register netdev %d", err);
}
- rtnl_lock();
return 0;
}
@@ -57,7 +56,6 @@ static void dev_addr_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
{
struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
- rtnl_unlock();
unregister_netdev(netdev);
free_netdev(netdev);
}
@@ -67,6 +65,7 @@ static void dev_addr_test_basic(struct kunit *test)
struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
+ rtnl_lock();
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, !!netdev->dev_addr);
memset(addr, 2, sizeof(addr));
@@ -76,6 +75,7 @@ static void dev_addr_test_basic(struct kunit *test)
memset(addr, 3, sizeof(addr));
dev_addr_set(netdev, addr);
KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, netdev->dev_addr, addr, sizeof(addr));
+ rtnl_unlock();
}
static void dev_addr_test_sync_one(struct kunit *test)
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static void dev_addr_test_sync_one(struct kunit *test)
datp = netdev_priv(netdev);
+ rtnl_lock();
memset(addr, 1, sizeof(addr));
eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, addr);
@@ -103,6 +104,7 @@ static void dev_addr_test_sync_one(struct kunit *test)
* considered synced and we overwrite in place.
*/
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, datp->addr_seen);
+ rtnl_unlock();
}
static void dev_addr_test_add_del(struct kunit *test)
@@ -114,6 +116,7 @@ static void dev_addr_test_add_del(struct kunit *test)
datp = netdev_priv(netdev);
+ rtnl_lock();
for (i = 1; i < 4; i++) {
memset(addr, i, sizeof(addr));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, dev_addr_add(netdev, addr,
@@ -143,6 +146,7 @@ static void dev_addr_test_add_del(struct kunit *test)
__hw_addr_sync_dev(&netdev->dev_addrs, netdev, dev_addr_test_sync,
dev_addr_test_unsync);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, datp->addr_seen);
+ rtnl_unlock();
}
static void dev_addr_test_del_main(struct kunit *test)
@@ -150,6 +154,7 @@ static void dev_addr_test_del_main(struct kunit *test)
struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
+ rtnl_lock();
memset(addr, 1, sizeof(addr));
eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, addr);
@@ -161,6 +166,7 @@ static void dev_addr_test_del_main(struct kunit *test)
NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_LAN));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -ENOENT, dev_addr_del(netdev, addr,
NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_LAN));
+ rtnl_unlock();
}
static void dev_addr_test_add_set(struct kunit *test)
@@ -172,6 +178,7 @@ static void dev_addr_test_add_set(struct kunit *test)
datp = netdev_priv(netdev);
+ rtnl_lock();
/* There is no external API like dev_addr_add_excl(),
* so shuffle the tree a little bit and exploit aliasing.
*/
@@ -191,6 +198,7 @@ static void dev_addr_test_add_set(struct kunit *test)
__hw_addr_sync_dev(&netdev->dev_addrs, netdev, dev_addr_test_sync,
dev_addr_test_unsync);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0xffff, datp->addr_seen);
+ rtnl_unlock();
}
static void dev_addr_test_add_excl(struct kunit *test)
@@ -199,6 +207,7 @@ static void dev_addr_test_add_excl(struct kunit *test)
u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
int i;
+ rtnl_lock();
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
memset(addr, i, sizeof(addr));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, dev_uc_add_excl(netdev, addr));
@@ -213,6 +222,7 @@ static void dev_addr_test_add_excl(struct kunit *test)
memset(addr, i, sizeof(addr));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -EEXIST, dev_uc_add_excl(netdev, addr));
}
+ rtnl_unlock();
}
static struct kunit_case dev_addr_test_cases[] = {
--
2.44.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-11 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 18:32 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-04-15 9:30 ` [PATCH net-next] net: dev_addr_lists: move locking out of init/exit in kunit patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240411183222.433713-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.