From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/10] s390/uv: update PG_arch_1 comment
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:21:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240412142120.220087-6-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240412142120.220087-1-david@redhat.com>
We removed the usage of PG_arch_1 for page tables in commit
a51324c430db ("s390/cmma: rework no-dat handling").
Let's update the comment in UV to reflect that.
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
arch/s390/kernel/uv.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
index 914dcec27329..ecfc08902215 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
@@ -495,13 +495,12 @@ int arch_make_page_accessible(struct page *page)
return 0;
/*
- * PG_arch_1 is used in 3 places:
- * 1. for kernel page tables during early boot
- * 2. for storage keys of huge pages and KVM
- * 3. As an indication that this small folio might be secure. This can
+ * PG_arch_1 is used in 2 places:
+ * 1. for storage keys of hugetlb folios and KVM
+ * 2. As an indication that this small folio might be secure. This can
* overindicate, e.g. we set the bit before calling
* convert_to_secure.
- * As secure pages are never huge, all 3 variants can co-exists.
+ * As secure pages are never large folios, both variants can co-exists.
*/
if (!test_bit(PG_arch_1, &folio->flags))
return 0;
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 14:21 [PATCH v2 00/10] s390: PG_arch_1+folio cleanups for uv+hugetlb David Hildenbrand
2024-04-12 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] s390/uv: don't call folio_wait_writeback() without a folio reference David Hildenbrand
2024-04-12 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] s390/uv: gmap_make_secure() cleanups for further changes David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 15:27 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-04-12 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] s390/uv: split large folios in gmap_make_secure() David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 15:43 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-04-12 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] s390/uv: convert PG_arch_1 users to only work on small folios David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 15:49 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-04-12 14:21 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-04-12 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] s390/uv: make uv_convert_from_secure() a static function David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 15:53 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-04-12 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] s390/uv: convert uv_destroy_owned_page() to uv_destroy_(folio|pte)() David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 16:25 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-04-12 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] s390/uv: convert uv_convert_owned_from_secure() to uv_convert_from_secure_(folio|pte)() David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 16:26 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-04-12 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] s390/uv: implement HAVE_ARCH_MAKE_FOLIO_ACCESSIBLE David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 16:29 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-04-12 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] s390/hugetlb: convert PG_arch_1 code to work on folio->flags David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 16:33 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-05-08 18:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-10 8:45 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-04-30 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] s390: PG_arch_1+folio cleanups for uv+hugetlb David Hildenbrand
2024-05-06 8:38 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-05-07 16:34 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240412142120.220087-6-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.