From: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
To: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [bisected] Kernel v6.9-rc3 fails to boot on a Thinkpad T60 with MITIGATION_RETHUNK=y (regression from v6.8.5)
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 12:49:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240413124901.7f1a8e51@yea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68e3503c-5573-4d82-8fb0-5b955c212d67@leemhuis.info>
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:46:09 +0200
"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> On 13.04.24 11:19, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>
> There was an earlier report about this here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/78e0d19c-b77a-4169-a80f-2eef91f4a1d6@gmail.com/
>
> Boris there suggested: "perhaps we should make
> CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETHUNK depend on !X86_32":
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240403173059.GJZg2SUwS8MXw7CdwF@fat_crate.local/
>
> But that did not happen afaics. Would it be wise to go down that path?
>
> Ciao, Thorsten
Ah I see. Well in my case it's no old P4 heater but a not that ancient T2400 Intel Core Duo with 31W TDP. ;)
But good to hear I would not need CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETHUNK anyhow? If that's the case depending on !X86_32 would make sense. Don't know whether the 32bit Intel Atoms (the only 'recent' X86_32 CPU left besides the Core Duo) would need this mitigation.
Regards,
Erhard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-13 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-13 0:49 [bisected] Kernel v6.9-rc3 fails to boot on a Thinkpad T60 with MITIGATION_RETHUNK=y (regression from v6.8.5) Erhard Furtner
2024-04-13 9:19 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2024-04-13 9:46 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-13 10:49 ` Erhard Furtner [this message]
2024-04-14 8:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-04-14 9:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-04-17 8:38 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-17 8:40 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240413124901.7f1a8e51@yea \
--to=erhard_f@mailbox.org \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.