From: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
To: wintera@linux.ibm.com, twinkler@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com
Cc: borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
guwen@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v6 04/11] net/smc: implement DMB-related operations of loopback-ism
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:02:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240414040304.54255-5-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240414040304.54255-1-guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
This implements DMB (un)registration and data move operations of
loopback-ism device.
Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
---
net/smc/smc_loopback.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
net/smc/smc_loopback.h | 13 +++++
2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
index 0349632a76c4..d75852549b00 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
@@ -15,10 +15,12 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <net/smc.h>
+#include "smc_cdc.h"
#include "smc_ism.h"
#include "smc_loopback.h"
#define SMC_LO_V2_CAPABLE 0x1 /* loopback-ism acts as ISMv2 */
+#define SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID (~(dma_addr_t)0)
static const char smc_lo_dev_name[] = "loopback-ism";
static struct smc_lo_dev *lo_dev;
@@ -48,6 +50,125 @@ static int smc_lo_query_rgid(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_gid *rgid,
return 0;
}
+static int smc_lo_register_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb,
+ void *client_priv)
+{
+ struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node, *tmp_node;
+ struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+ int sba_idx, rc;
+
+ /* check space for new dmb */
+ for_each_clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask, SMC_LO_MAX_DMBS) {
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask))
+ break;
+ }
+ if (sba_idx == SMC_LO_MAX_DMBS)
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ dmb_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*dmb_node), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dmb_node) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_bit;
+ }
+
+ dmb_node->sba_idx = sba_idx;
+ dmb_node->len = dmb->dmb_len;
+ dmb_node->cpu_addr = kzalloc(dmb_node->len, GFP_KERNEL |
+ __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY |
+ __GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
+ if (!dmb_node->cpu_addr) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_node;
+ }
+ dmb_node->dma_addr = SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
+
+again:
+ /* add new dmb into hash table */
+ get_random_bytes(&dmb_node->token, sizeof(dmb_node->token));
+ write_lock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_node->token) {
+ if (tmp_node->token == dmb_node->token) {
+ write_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ goto again;
+ }
+ }
+ hash_add(ldev->dmb_ht, &dmb_node->list, dmb_node->token);
+ write_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+ dmb->sba_idx = dmb_node->sba_idx;
+ dmb->dmb_tok = dmb_node->token;
+ dmb->cpu_addr = dmb_node->cpu_addr;
+ dmb->dma_addr = dmb_node->dma_addr;
+ dmb->dmb_len = dmb_node->len;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_node:
+ kfree(dmb_node);
+err_bit:
+ clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask);
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb)
+{
+ struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
+ struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+
+ /* remove dmb from hash table */
+ write_lock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb->dmb_tok) {
+ if (tmp_node->token == dmb->dmb_tok) {
+ dmb_node = tmp_node;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!dmb_node) {
+ write_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ hash_del(&dmb_node->list);
+ write_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+ clear_bit(dmb_node->sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask);
+ kfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr);
+ kfree(dmb_node);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int smc_lo_move_data(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 dmb_tok,
+ unsigned int idx, bool sf, unsigned int offset,
+ void *data, unsigned int size)
+{
+ struct smc_lo_dmb_node *rmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
+ struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+ struct smc_connection *conn;
+
+ read_lock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_tok) {
+ if (tmp_node->token == dmb_tok) {
+ rmb_node = tmp_node;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!rmb_node) {
+ read_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ memcpy((char *)rmb_node->cpu_addr + offset, data, size);
+ read_unlock_bh(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+ if (sf) {
+ conn = smcd->conn[rmb_node->sba_idx];
+ if (conn && !conn->killed)
+ tasklet_schedule(&conn->rx_tsklet);
+ else
+ return -EPIPE;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int smc_lo_supports_v2(void)
{
return SMC_LO_V2_CAPABLE;
@@ -74,14 +195,14 @@ static struct device *smc_lo_get_dev(struct smcd_dev *smcd)
static const struct smcd_ops lo_ops = {
.query_remote_gid = smc_lo_query_rgid,
- .register_dmb = NULL,
- .unregister_dmb = NULL,
+ .register_dmb = smc_lo_register_dmb,
+ .unregister_dmb = smc_lo_unregister_dmb,
.add_vlan_id = NULL,
.del_vlan_id = NULL,
.set_vlan_required = NULL,
.reset_vlan_required = NULL,
.signal_event = NULL,
- .move_data = NULL,
+ .move_data = smc_lo_move_data,
.supports_v2 = smc_lo_supports_v2,
.get_local_gid = smc_lo_get_local_gid,
.get_chid = smc_lo_get_chid,
@@ -146,6 +267,8 @@ static void smcd_lo_unregister_dev(struct smc_lo_dev *ldev)
static int smc_lo_dev_init(struct smc_lo_dev *ldev)
{
smc_lo_generate_ids(ldev);
+ rwlock_init(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+ hash_init(ldev->dmb_ht);
return smcd_lo_register_dev(ldev);
}
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.h b/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
index c11529b15041..4b36acbc27da 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
@@ -20,13 +20,26 @@
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_LO)
#define SMC_LO_MAX_DMBS 5000
+#define SMC_LO_DMBS_HASH_BITS 12
#define SMC_LO_RESERVED_CHID 0xFFFF
+struct smc_lo_dmb_node {
+ struct hlist_node list;
+ u64 token;
+ u32 len;
+ u32 sba_idx;
+ void *cpu_addr;
+ dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+};
+
struct smc_lo_dev {
struct smcd_dev *smcd;
struct device dev;
u16 chid;
struct smcd_gid local_gid;
+ rwlock_t dmb_ht_lock;
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(sba_idx_mask, SMC_LO_MAX_DMBS);
+ DECLARE_HASHTABLE(dmb_ht, SMC_LO_DMBS_HASH_BITS);
};
int smc_loopback_init(void);
--
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-14 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-14 4:02 [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] net/smc: SMC intra-OS shortcut with loopback-ism Wen Gu
2024-04-14 4:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/11] net/smc: decouple ism_client from SMC-D DMB registration Wen Gu
2024-04-15 8:41 ` Alexandra Winter
2024-04-16 13:58 ` Wen Gu
2024-04-25 11:29 ` Wenjia Zhang
2024-04-14 4:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/11] net/smc: introduce loopback-ism for SMC intra-OS shortcut Wen Gu
2024-04-17 10:20 ` Gerd Bayer
2024-04-14 4:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/11] net/smc: implement ID-related operations of loopback-ism Wen Gu
2024-04-14 4:02 ` Wen Gu [this message]
2024-04-14 4:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/11] net/smc: mark optional smcd_ops and check for support when called Wen Gu
2024-04-14 4:02 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/11] net/smc: ignore loopback-ism when dumping SMC-D devices Wen Gu
2024-04-14 4:03 ` [PATCH net-next v6 07/11] net/smc: register loopback-ism into SMC-D device list Wen Gu
2024-04-25 11:29 ` Wenjia Zhang
2024-04-25 13:29 ` Alexandra Winter
2024-04-26 8:04 ` Wenjia Zhang
2024-04-26 8:09 ` Wen Gu
2024-04-14 4:03 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/11] net/smc: add operations to merge sndbuf with peer DMB Wen Gu
2024-04-14 4:03 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/11] net/smc: {at|de}tach sndbuf to peer DMB if supported Wen Gu
2024-04-14 4:03 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/11] net/smc: adapt cursor update when sndbuf and peer DMB are merged Wen Gu
2024-04-16 11:05 ` Simon Horman
2024-04-16 14:06 ` Wen Gu
2024-04-14 4:03 ` [PATCH net-next v6 11/11] net/smc: implement DMB-merged operations of loopback-ism Wen Gu
2024-04-17 15:36 ` [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] net/smc: SMC intra-OS shortcut with loopback-ism Wenjia Zhang
2024-04-23 6:45 ` Wen Gu
2024-04-25 11:30 ` Wenjia Zhang
2024-04-26 7:02 ` Jan Karcher
2024-04-26 8:17 ` Wen Gu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240414040304.54255-5-guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=twinkler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.