From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>
Cc: "Darrick J . Wong " <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: don't run tests that require v4 file systems when not supported
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 09:40:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240418074046.2326450-6-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240418074046.2326450-1-hch@lst.de>
Add a _require_xfs_nocrc helper that checks that we can mkfs and mount
a crc=0 file systems before running tests that rely on it to avoid failures
on kernels with CONFIG_XFS_SUPPORT_V4 disabled.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
common/xfs | 10 ++++++++++
tests/xfs/002 | 1 +
tests/xfs/095 | 1 +
tests/xfs/096 | 1 +
tests/xfs/132 | 1 +
tests/xfs/148 | 6 ++++++
tests/xfs/194 | 10 ++++++++++
tests/xfs/199 | 1 +
tests/xfs/300 | 1 +
tests/xfs/526 | 3 +++
tests/xfs/612 | 1 +
tests/xfs/613 | 1 +
12 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
index 49ca5a2d5..733c3a5be 100644
--- a/common/xfs
+++ b/common/xfs
@@ -1852,3 +1852,13 @@ _xfs_discard_max_offset_kb()
$XFS_IO_PROG -c 'statfs' "$1" | \
awk '{g[$1] = $3} END {print (g["geom.bsize"] * g["geom.datablocks"] / 1024)}'
}
+
+# check if mkfs and the kernel support nocrc (v4) file systems
+_require_xfs_nocrc()
+{
+ _scratch_mkfs_xfs -m crc=0 > /dev/null 2>&1 || \
+ _notrun "v4 file systems not supported"
+ _try_scratch_mount > /dev/null 2>&1 || \
+ _notrun "v4 file systems not supported"
+ _scratch_unmount
+}
diff --git a/tests/xfs/002 b/tests/xfs/002
index 8dfd2693b..26d0cd6e4 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/002
+++ b/tests/xfs/002
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ _begin_fstest auto quick growfs
_supported_fs xfs
_require_scratch_nocheck
_require_no_large_scratch_dev
+_require_xfs_nocrc
_scratch_mkfs_xfs -m crc=0 -d size=128m >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "mkfs failed"
diff --git a/tests/xfs/095 b/tests/xfs/095
index a3891c85e..e7dc3e9f4 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/095
+++ b/tests/xfs/095
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ _begin_fstest log v2log auto
_supported_fs xfs
_require_scratch
_require_v2log
+_require_xfs_nocrc
if [ "$(blockdev --getss $SCRATCH_DEV)" != "512" ]; then
_notrun "need 512b sector size"
diff --git a/tests/xfs/096 b/tests/xfs/096
index 7eff6cb1d..0a1bfb3fa 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/096
+++ b/tests/xfs/096
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ _supported_fs xfs
_require_scratch
_require_xfs_quota
+_require_xfs_nocrc
function option_string()
{
diff --git a/tests/xfs/132 b/tests/xfs/132
index ee1c8c1ec..b46d3d28c 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/132
+++ b/tests/xfs/132
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ _supported_fs xfs
# we intentionally corrupt the filesystem, so don't check it after the test
_require_scratch_nocheck
+_require_xfs_nocrc
# on success, we'll get a shutdown filesystem with a really noisy log message
# due to transaction cancellation. Hence we don't want to check dmesg here.
diff --git a/tests/xfs/148 b/tests/xfs/148
index c9f634cfd..fde3bf476 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/148
+++ b/tests/xfs/148
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ _cleanup()
_supported_fs xfs
_require_test
_require_attrs
+_require_xfs_nocrc
+
_disable_dmesg_check
imgfile=$TEST_DIR/img-$seq
@@ -40,6 +42,10 @@ test_names=("something" "$nullstr" "$slashstr" "another")
rm -f $imgfile $imgfile.old
# Format image file w/o crcs so we can sed the image file
+#
+# TODO: It might be possible to rewrite this using proper xfs_db
+# fs manipulation commands that would work with CRCs.
+#
# We need to use 512 byte inodes to ensure the attr forks remain in short form
# even when security xattrs are present so we are always doing name matches on
# lookup and not name hash compares as leaf/node forms will do.
diff --git a/tests/xfs/194 b/tests/xfs/194
index 5a1dff5d2..2fcc55b3e 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/194
+++ b/tests/xfs/194
@@ -30,6 +30,16 @@ _supported_fs xfs
# real QA test starts here
_require_scratch
+
+#
+# This currently forces nocrc because only that can support 512 byte block size
+# and thus block size = 1/8 page size on 4k page size systems.
+# In theory we could run it on systems with larger page size with CRCs, or hope
+# that large folios would trigger the same issue.
+# But for now that is left as an exercise for the reader.
+#
+_require_xfs_nocrc
+
_scratch_mkfs_xfs >/dev/null 2>&1
# For this test we use block size = 1/8 page size
diff --git a/tests/xfs/199 b/tests/xfs/199
index 4669f2c3e..f99b04db3 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/199
+++ b/tests/xfs/199
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ _cleanup()
_supported_fs xfs
_require_scratch
+_require_xfs_nocrc
# clear any mkfs options so that we can directly specify the options we need to
# be able to test the features bitmask behaviour correctly.
diff --git a/tests/xfs/300 b/tests/xfs/300
index 2ee5eee71..bc1f0efc6 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/300
+++ b/tests/xfs/300
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ _begin_fstest auto fsr
. ./common/filter
_require_scratch
+_require_xfs_nocrc
# real QA test starts here
diff --git a/tests/xfs/526 b/tests/xfs/526
index 4261e8497..c5c5f9b1a 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/526
+++ b/tests/xfs/526
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ _require_test
_require_scratch_nocheck
_require_xfs_mkfs_cfgfile
+# Currently the only conflicting options are v4 specific
+_require_xfs_nocrc
+
cfgfile=$TEST_DIR/a
rm -rf $cfgfile
diff --git a/tests/xfs/612 b/tests/xfs/612
index 4ae4d3977..0f6df7deb 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/612
+++ b/tests/xfs/612
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ _supported_fs xfs
_require_scratch_xfs_inobtcount
_require_command "$XFS_ADMIN_PROG" "xfs_admin"
_require_xfs_repair_upgrade inobtcount
+_require_xfs_nocrc
# Make sure we can't upgrade to inobt on a V4 filesystem
_scratch_mkfs -m crc=0,inobtcount=0,finobt=0 >> $seqres.full
diff --git a/tests/xfs/613 b/tests/xfs/613
index 522358cb3..8bff21711 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/613
+++ b/tests/xfs/613
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ _supported_fs xfs
_fixed_by_kernel_commit 237d7887ae72 \
"xfs: show the proper user quota options"
+_require_xfs_nocrc
_require_test
_require_loop
_require_xfs_io_command "falloc"
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-18 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-18 7:40 fix kernels without v5 support v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs/045: don't force v4 file systems Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 14:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs/263: split out the v4 test Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 14:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs/512: split out v4 specific tests Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 14:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-18 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 7:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs/{158,160}: split out v4 tests Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 15:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-04-18 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-04-18 15:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: don't run tests that require v4 file systems when not supported Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240418074046.2326450-6-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.