From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97E1E6E60E for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714334431; cv=none; b=Ad2ak+EAjaZeT0p0Wk78aSbmuGnglj5HDMb61koyVVmpQZu7L/8TuN5ZMhhQHkeycOLn/IvYDsCobwzWnMRUWanb3+BmUy1KiFZVHHnJAu7SiGU+z81JTxI84zgyHJeDvNAGMFNBgIaZ1HbnjF78IRMynIUUitUKwrj58pW//Sc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714334431; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kfZIveIrgwb6JOnzFNWz0VrINn7gfp3EZMthYdZzpvo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=d9vvpcV/wg4jwjkG2sS1jQPxiPn77VQorpPNUJAKnbykiB1FL5b6/7zTjqbRM72ZT6f48DYG0vOKrr0fJ05ImipcUnZM95YmUHgcf/RzI1H+kaAQOVqt1PH3dGC8Xt9IpPmqKMnF8tFuka4x86HciPiKyOCW0oLw2vDrLIhqLfM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.133 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DE840429 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:00:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.951 X-Spam-Level: Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id lQ3979ooEKPu for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2604:1380:4641:c500::1; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=srs0=bpti=mb=goodmis.org=rostedt@kernel.org; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp2.osuosl.org 8DDBD40464 Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 8DDBD40464 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DDBD40464 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AD16023F; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86097C113CC; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:00:23 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Shuah Khan Cc: "tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "conduct@kernel.org" Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Code of Conduct Committee: March 31, 2024 Message-ID: <20240428160023.1fa830ec@rorschach.local.home> In-Reply-To: <97f44075-8bef-479d-bebb-f44c1a5886df@linuxfoundation.org> References: <97f44075-8bef-479d-bebb-f44c1a5886df@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tech-board-discuss@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:38:27 -0600 Shuah Khan wrote: > Dear TAB members, > > Please review this Code of Conduct Report for October 1, 2023 through > March 31, 2024 and give us feedback. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Linux Kernel Code of Conduct Committee: March 31, 2024 > > In the period of October 1, 2023 through March 31, 2024, the Code of > Conduct Committee received the following reports: > > Unprofessional behavior or comments in email: 2 > > The result of the investigation: > - Education and coaching clarifying the role of Code of Conduct > conduct on conversations that don't go against the CoC. > - Education and coaching the individuals on the impact of making > unprofessional comments which could be misunderstood leading > to negative impressions about the community. > > The reports were about the offhand comments made while rejecting > the code which are not violations of the Code of Conduct. > > Unacceptable behavior or comments on a private invitee only chat > channel: 1 > - Education and coaching clarifying the role of Code of Conduct > conduct on conversations that occur on a private chat channel. > > We would like to thank the Linux kernel community members who have > supported the adoption of the Code of Conduct and who continue to > uphold the professional standards of our community. If you have > questions about this report, please write to . > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > [ Coming back from my travels in Japan and catching up on email (6 hour layover in Detroit!) ] LGTM. -- Steve