All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,linmiaohe@huawei.com,jane.chu@oracle.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-memory-failure-try-to-send-sigbus-even-if-unmap-failed.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 08:29:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240502152947.DA572C113CC@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: mm/memory-failure: try to send SIGBUS even if unmap failed
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     mm-memory-failure-try-to-send-sigbus-even-if-unmap-failed.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-memory-failure-try-to-send-sigbus-even-if-unmap-failed.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Subject: mm/memory-failure: try to send SIGBUS even if unmap failed
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 17:24:56 -0600

Patch series "Enhance soft hwpoison handling and injection".

This series aim at the following enhancement -

1. Let one hwpoison injector, that is, madvise(MADV_HWPOISON) to behave
   more like as if a real UE occurred. Because the other two injectors
   such as hwpoison-inject and the 'einj' on x86 can't, and it seems to
   me we need a better simulation to real UE scenario.

2. For years, if the kernel is unable to unmap a hwpoisoned page, it send
   a SIGKILL instead of SIGBUS to prevent user process from potentially
   accessing the page again. But in doing so, the user process also lose
   important information: vaddr, for recovery.  Fortunately, the kernel
   already has code to kill process re-accessing a hwpoisoned page, so
   remove the '!unmap_success' check.

3. Right now, if a thp page under GUP longterm pin is hwpoisoned, and
   kernel cannot split the thp page, memory-failure simply ignores
   the UE and returns.  That's not ideal, it could deliver a SIGBUS with
   useful information for userspace recovery.


This patch (of 3):

For years when it comes down to kill a process due to hwpoison, a SIGBUS
is delivered only if unmap has been successful.  Otherwise, a SIGKILL is
delivered.  And the reason for that is to prevent the involved process
from accessing the hwpoisoned page again.

Since then a lot has changed, a hwpoisoned page is marked and upon being
re-accessed, the process will be killed immediately.  So let's take out
the '!unmap_success' factor and try to deliver SIGBUS if possible.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240501232458.3919593-1-jane.chu@oracle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240501232458.3919593-2-jane.chu@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/memory-failure.c |   13 ++++---------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory-failure.c~mm-memory-failure-try-to-send-sigbus-even-if-unmap-failed
+++ a/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -517,19 +517,14 @@ void add_to_kill_ksm(struct task_struct
  * Also when FAIL is set do a force kill because something went
  * wrong earlier.
  */
-static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill, bool fail,
+static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill,
 		unsigned long pfn, int flags)
 {
 	struct to_kill *tk, *next;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(tk, next, to_kill, nd) {
 		if (forcekill) {
-			/*
-			 * In case something went wrong with munmapping
-			 * make sure the process doesn't catch the
-			 * signal and then access the memory. Just kill it.
-			 */
-			if (fail || tk->addr == -EFAULT) {
+			if (tk->addr == -EFAULT) {
 				pr_err("%#lx: forcibly killing %s:%d because of failure to unmap corrupted page\n",
 				       pfn, tk->tsk->comm, tk->tsk->pid);
 				do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV,
@@ -1660,7 +1655,7 @@ static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struc
 	 */
 	forcekill = folio_test_dirty(folio) || (flags & MF_MUST_KILL) ||
 		    !unmap_success;
-	kill_procs(&tokill, forcekill, !unmap_success, pfn, flags);
+	kill_procs(&tokill, forcekill, pfn, flags);
 
 	return unmap_success;
 }
@@ -1724,7 +1719,7 @@ static void unmap_and_kill(struct list_h
 		unmap_mapping_range(mapping, start, size, 0);
 	}
 
-	kill_procs(to_kill, flags & MF_MUST_KILL, false, pfn, flags);
+	kill_procs(to_kill, flags & MF_MUST_KILL, pfn, flags);
 }
 
 /*
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from jane.chu@oracle.com are

mm-memory-failure-try-to-send-sigbus-even-if-unmap-failed.patch
mm-madvise-add-mf_action_required-to-madvisemadv_hwpoison.patch
mm-memory-failure-send-sigbus-in-the-event-of-thp-split-fail.patch


             reply	other threads:[~2024-05-02 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-02 15:29 Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-22 21:49 + mm-memory-failure-try-to-send-sigbus-even-if-unmap-failed.patch added to mm-unstable branch Andrew Morton
2024-05-28 21:44 Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240502152947.DA572C113CC@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.