Re: [PULL] IIO: 2nd set of new device support, features and cleanup for the 6.10 cycle

[Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>]

On Fri, 3 May 2024 09:25:13 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 3 May 2024 07:23:31 +0200
> Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 07:22:10AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:  
> > > On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 07:21:43AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:    
> > > > On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 07:16:02AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:    
> > > > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 08:15:09PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:    
> > > > > > The following changes since commit 84e79a7f63e8caeac0c1a0817408860875a9b23e:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >   Merge tag 'peci-next-6.10-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwi/linux into char-misc-next (2024-04-23 21:31:45 -0700)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git tags/iio-for-6.10b    
> > > > > 
> > > > > Pulled and pushed out now, thanks.    
> > > > 
> > > > Oops, nope, got the following error:
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes tag: Fixes: 0ecc363ccea7 ("iio: make invensense timestamp module generic)
> > > > 	Has these problem(s):
> > > > 		- Subject has leading but no trailing quotes
> > > > 
> > > > I'll rewrite this one, but note that you will have to rebase your tree
> > > > now, sorry.    
> > > 
> > > Here's the full error, was cut off one line:
> > > Commit: a5918cecaec3 ("iio: invensense: fix timestamp glitches when switching frequency")
> > > 	Fixes tag: Fixes: 0ecc363ccea7 ("iio: make invensense timestamp module generic)
> > > 	Has these problem(s):
> > > 		- Subject has leading but no trailing quotes
> > >     
> > 
> > Nope, no fixup on my side, that just messed the whole tree up.  Can you
> > fix this on your end and send a new pull request?  
> 
> Sorry!  I messed up fixing that tag and I guess it didn't get flagged because there
> was a very similar issue the day before in next or I didn't leave it long enough
> for next checks to find it again.
> 
> I obviously need to check why the checking script / workflow I use didn't catch this.
> 
> I've fixed up the tree up, but it will be this evening before I have my signing key
> available to send a revised pull request.
> 
> Thanks and sorry for wasting your time :(

Having caught up with another thread I not only messed up the tag, the
rebase of that patch I did to resolve a clash between my two branches is wrong
as well.  Will sort it out before I send the pull request.

Definitely not my finest hour :(

J

> 
> Jonathan
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> >   
> 
>