All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org,
	djwong@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
	chandan.babu@oracle.com
Cc: hare@suse.de, ritesh.list@gmail.com, john.g.garry@oracle.com,
	ziy@nvidia.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
	p.raghav@samsung.com, kernel@pankajraghav.com, mcgrof@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 04/11] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in readahead
Date: Fri,  3 May 2024 02:53:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240503095353.3798063-5-mcgrof@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240503095353.3798063-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>

From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>

page_cache_ra_unbounded() was allocating single pages (0 order folios)
if there was no folio found in an index. Allocate mapping_min_order folios
as we need to guarantee the minimum order if it is set.
When read_pages() is triggered and if a page is already present, check
for truncation and move the ractl->_index by mapping_min_nrpages if that
folio was truncated. This is done to ensure we keep the alignment
requirement while adding a folio to the page cache.

page_cache_ra_order() tries to allocate folio to the page cache with a
higher order if the index aligns with that order. Modify it so that the
order does not go below the mapping_min_order requirement of the page
cache. This function will do the right thing even if the new_order passed
is less than the mapping_min_order.
When adding new folios to the page cache we must also ensure the index
used is aligned to the mapping_min_order as the page cache requires the
index to be aligned to the order of the folio.

readahead_expand() is called from readahead aops to extend the range of
the readahead so this function can assume ractl->_index to be aligned with
min_order.

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
---
 mm/readahead.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c
index 2361634a84fd..646a90ada59a 100644
--- a/mm/readahead.c
+++ b/mm/readahead.c
@@ -206,9 +206,10 @@ void page_cache_ra_unbounded(struct readahead_control *ractl,
 		unsigned long nr_to_read, unsigned long lookahead_size)
 {
 	struct address_space *mapping = ractl->mapping;
-	unsigned long index = readahead_index(ractl);
+	unsigned long ra_folio_index, index = readahead_index(ractl);
 	gfp_t gfp_mask = readahead_gfp_mask(mapping);
-	unsigned long i = 0;
+	unsigned long mark, i = 0;
+	unsigned int min_nrpages = mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping);
 
 	/*
 	 * Partway through the readahead operation, we will have added
@@ -223,6 +224,22 @@ void page_cache_ra_unbounded(struct readahead_control *ractl,
 	unsigned int nofs = memalloc_nofs_save();
 
 	filemap_invalidate_lock_shared(mapping);
+	index = mapping_align_start_index(mapping, index);
+
+	/*
+	 * As iterator `i` is aligned to min_nrpages, round_up the
+	 * difference between nr_to_read and lookahead_size to mark the
+	 * index that only has lookahead or "async_region" to set the
+	 * readahead flag.
+	 */
+	ra_folio_index = round_up(readahead_index(ractl) + nr_to_read - lookahead_size,
+				  min_nrpages);
+	mark = ra_folio_index - index;
+	if (index != readahead_index(ractl)) {
+		nr_to_read += readahead_index(ractl) - index;
+		ractl->_index = index;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Preallocate as many pages as we will need.
 	 */
@@ -230,6 +247,8 @@ void page_cache_ra_unbounded(struct readahead_control *ractl,
 		struct folio *folio = xa_load(&mapping->i_pages, index + i);
 
 		if (folio && !xa_is_value(folio)) {
+			long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+
 			/*
 			 * Page already present?  Kick off the current batch
 			 * of contiguous pages before continuing with the
@@ -239,23 +258,35 @@ void page_cache_ra_unbounded(struct readahead_control *ractl,
 			 * not worth getting one just for that.
 			 */
 			read_pages(ractl);
-			ractl->_index += folio_nr_pages(folio);
+
+			/*
+			 * Move the ractl->_index by at least min_pages
+			 * if the folio got truncated to respect the
+			 * alignment constraint in the page cache.
+			 *
+			 */
+			if (mapping != folio->mapping)
+				nr_pages = min_nrpages;
+
+			VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(nr_pages < min_nrpages, folio);
+			ractl->_index += nr_pages;
 			i = ractl->_index + ractl->_nr_pages - index;
 			continue;
 		}
 
-		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_mask, 0);
+		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_mask,
+					    mapping_min_folio_order(mapping));
 		if (!folio)
 			break;
 		if (filemap_add_folio(mapping, folio, index + i,
 					gfp_mask) < 0) {
 			folio_put(folio);
 			read_pages(ractl);
-			ractl->_index++;
+			ractl->_index += min_nrpages;
 			i = ractl->_index + ractl->_nr_pages - index;
 			continue;
 		}
-		if (i == nr_to_read - lookahead_size)
+		if (i == mark)
 			folio_set_readahead(folio);
 		ractl->_workingset |= folio_test_workingset(folio);
 		ractl->_nr_pages += folio_nr_pages(folio);
@@ -489,12 +520,18 @@ void page_cache_ra_order(struct readahead_control *ractl,
 {
 	struct address_space *mapping = ractl->mapping;
 	pgoff_t index = readahead_index(ractl);
+	unsigned int min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(mapping);
 	pgoff_t limit = (i_size_read(mapping->host) - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	pgoff_t mark = index + ra->size - ra->async_size;
 	int err = 0;
 	gfp_t gfp = readahead_gfp_mask(mapping);
+	unsigned int min_ra_size = max(4, mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping));
 
-	if (!mapping_large_folio_support(mapping) || ra->size < 4)
+	/*
+	 * Fallback when size < min_nrpages as each folio should be
+	 * at least min_nrpages anyway.
+	 */
+	if (!mapping_large_folio_support(mapping) || ra->size < min_ra_size)
 		goto fallback;
 
 	limit = min(limit, index + ra->size - 1);
@@ -503,9 +540,18 @@ void page_cache_ra_order(struct readahead_control *ractl,
 		new_order += 2;
 		new_order = min_t(unsigned int, MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER, new_order);
 		new_order = min_t(unsigned int, new_order, ilog2(ra->size));
+		new_order = max(new_order, min_order);
 	}
 
 	filemap_invalidate_lock_shared(mapping);
+	/*
+	 * If the new_order is greater than min_order and index is
+	 * already aligned to new_order, then this will be noop as index
+	 * aligned to new_order should also be aligned to min_order.
+	 */
+	ractl->_index = mapping_align_start_index(mapping, index);
+	index = readahead_index(ractl);
+
 	while (index <= limit) {
 		unsigned int order = new_order;
 
@@ -513,7 +559,7 @@ void page_cache_ra_order(struct readahead_control *ractl,
 		if (index & ((1UL << order) - 1))
 			order = __ffs(index);
 		/* Don't allocate pages past EOF */
-		while (index + (1UL << order) - 1 > limit)
+		while (order > min_order && index + (1UL << order) - 1 > limit)
 			order--;
 		err = ra_alloc_folio(ractl, index, mark, order, gfp);
 		if (err)
@@ -776,8 +822,15 @@ void readahead_expand(struct readahead_control *ractl,
 	struct file_ra_state *ra = ractl->ra;
 	pgoff_t new_index, new_nr_pages;
 	gfp_t gfp_mask = readahead_gfp_mask(mapping);
+	unsigned long min_nrpages = mapping_min_folio_nrpages(mapping);
+	unsigned int min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(mapping);
 
 	new_index = new_start / PAGE_SIZE;
+	/*
+	 * Readahead code should have aligned the ractl->_index to
+	 * min_nrpages before calling readahead aops.
+	 */
+	VM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(ractl->_index, min_nrpages));
 
 	/* Expand the leading edge downwards */
 	while (ractl->_index > new_index) {
@@ -787,9 +840,11 @@ void readahead_expand(struct readahead_control *ractl,
 		if (folio && !xa_is_value(folio))
 			return; /* Folio apparently present */
 
-		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_mask, 0);
+		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_mask, min_order);
 		if (!folio)
 			return;
+
+		index = mapping_align_start_index(mapping, index);
 		if (filemap_add_folio(mapping, folio, index, gfp_mask) < 0) {
 			folio_put(folio);
 			return;
@@ -799,7 +854,7 @@ void readahead_expand(struct readahead_control *ractl,
 			ractl->_workingset = true;
 			psi_memstall_enter(&ractl->_pflags);
 		}
-		ractl->_nr_pages++;
+		ractl->_nr_pages += min_nrpages;
 		ractl->_index = folio->index;
 	}
 
@@ -814,9 +869,11 @@ void readahead_expand(struct readahead_control *ractl,
 		if (folio && !xa_is_value(folio))
 			return; /* Folio apparently present */
 
-		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_mask, 0);
+		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp_mask, min_order);
 		if (!folio)
 			return;
+
+		index = mapping_align_start_index(mapping, index);
 		if (filemap_add_folio(mapping, folio, index, gfp_mask) < 0) {
 			folio_put(folio);
 			return;
@@ -826,10 +883,10 @@ void readahead_expand(struct readahead_control *ractl,
 			ractl->_workingset = true;
 			psi_memstall_enter(&ractl->_pflags);
 		}
-		ractl->_nr_pages++;
+		ractl->_nr_pages += min_nrpages;
 		if (ra) {
-			ra->size++;
-			ra->async_size++;
+			ra->size += min_nrpages;
+			ra->async_size += min_nrpages;
 		}
 	}
 }
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-03  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-03  9:53 [PATCH v5 00/11] enable bs > ps in XFS Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-03  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] readahead: rework loop in page_cache_ra_unbounded() Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-03  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-03  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] filemap: allocate mapping_min_order folios in the page cache Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-03  9:53 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2024-05-03 14:32   ` [PATCH v5 04/11] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in readahead Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-03  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-03 14:53   ` Zi Yan
2024-05-15 15:32   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-16 14:56     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-03  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] filemap: cap PTE range to be created to allowed zero fill in folio_map_range() Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-03  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-07 14:58   ` [RFC] iomap: use huge zero folio in iomap_dio_zero Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-07 15:11     ` Zi Yan
2024-05-07 16:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-08 11:39       ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-08 11:43         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-09 12:31           ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-09 12:46             ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-09 12:55               ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-09 12:58                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-09 14:32                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-09 15:05                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-09 15:08                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-09 15:09                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-15  0:50     ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-15  2:34       ` Keith Busch
2024-05-15  4:04         ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-15 15:59           ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-15 18:03             ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-16 15:02               ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-17 12:36                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-17 12:56                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-05-17 13:30                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-15 11:48       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-07 16:00   ` [PATCH v5 07/11] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-07 16:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-07 16:11       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-07 16:13         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-08  4:24           ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-08 11:22             ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-08 11:36             ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-08 11:20     ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-03  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] xfs: use kvmalloc for xattr buffers Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-03  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] xfs: expose block size in stat Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-03  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] xfs: make the calculation generic in xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count() Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-07  8:40   ` John Garry
2024-05-07 21:13     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-08 11:28       ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-05-03  9:53 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support Luis Chamberlain
2024-05-07  0:05   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240503095353.3798063-5-mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.