From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,shuah@kernel.org,peterx@redhat.com,muchun.song@linux.dev,david@redhat.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-hugetlb-document-why-hugetlb-uses-folio_mapcount-for-cow-reuse-decisions.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Sun, 05 May 2024 17:59:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240506005905.EC186C113CC@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/hugetlb: document why hugetlb uses folio_mapcount() for COW reuse decisions
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-hugetlb-document-why-hugetlb-uses-folio_mapcount-for-cow-reuse-decisions.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: mm/hugetlb: document why hugetlb uses folio_mapcount() for COW reuse decisions
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 10:52:59 +0200
Let's document why hugetlb still uses folio_mapcount() and is prone to
leaking memory between processes, for example using vmsplice() that still
uses FOLL_GET.
More details can be found in [1], especially around how hugetlb pages
cannot really be overcommitted, and why we don't particularly care about
these vmsplice() leaks for hugetlb -- in contrast to ordinary memory.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/8b42a24d-caf0-46ef-9e15-0f88d47d2f21@redhat.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240502085259.103784-3-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlb-document-why-hugetlb-uses-folio_mapcount-for-cow-reuse-decisions
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -5963,6 +5963,13 @@ retry_avoidcopy:
/*
* If no-one else is actually using this page, we're the exclusive
* owner and can reuse this page.
+ *
+ * Note that we don't rely on the (safer) folio refcount here, because
+ * copying the hugetlb folio when there are unexpected (temporary)
+ * folio references could harm simple fork()+exit() users when
+ * we run out of free hugetlb folios: we would have to kill processes
+ * in scenarios that used to work. As a side effect, there can still
+ * be leaks between processes, for example, with FOLL_GET users.
*/
if (folio_mapcount(old_folio) == 1 && folio_test_anon(old_folio)) {
if (!PageAnonExclusive(&old_folio->page)) {
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@redhat.com are
reply other threads:[~2024-05-06 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240506005905.EC186C113CC@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.