From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBAB881721 for ; Mon, 6 May 2024 14:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715004246; cv=none; b=hxQVcsv3ppOxzS+yE5r919dop42pIg/2bedA0FufxxQnjbS8ZdU2owJYOgE5GkpJo2LRCJejBXe8z2Vm9oHb0mjfrfa1fXnP5MVV+495l73RJ6ZpjxFCDleqPggnM9/RizDbTohEJKiauZX/Hko3PtgXCTl/NJtsQ49+e0SqaEY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715004246; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0UjED61Jh9Jzm1bpuRCl2fNikOVYlkHF8HPiOiEvdWk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Vb4jznpjdVIcBZo+3LBvuBeoWmweqWmWV7OTKxexmHywV1Cp/h3MQ/5Zul7pESvYNJ6DmgHWdvEYzM2im7N3KUvpLPr/CPMLNgkVC3ohkms5RU03prKDBTWav1ijP8ogwECG5fXZUPluncgRFE/lg6quC+fpBS65zLnb1fTxkAA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XONi0HQd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XONi0HQd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEB19C116B1; Mon, 6 May 2024 14:04:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715004245; bh=0UjED61Jh9Jzm1bpuRCl2fNikOVYlkHF8HPiOiEvdWk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XONi0HQdeIQmXfSfKA/QgR6eTkmp6g2oJIuNXqWYbA7zAQFdC0DD3hMcSvd8ScxlT FQBwoRSdwIUH9e/bqqlWAov7b0GeSlq4ZWGIzHfC81mbeIHB8zxvuNQM7d5n5Nacr5 eJRVzfgTwDlXF0e9MopOX3sCj37Gj9wTMe9e5N2KahrQxEaGbNrTnPnYjYw38Lf7A0 2MjZ/RJ2z00vJEfK1Zh0HgdY9TB5AIBDAmPwIcyudMJJDCB9eNXMr9N9s7Y8j/YGYq VTtnpsftx1ezrgJKsTOYKTqnB+PoHH9cPT5ZSO0dZCMzBN0/LkVHnRVPwgaIlmCXG7 NowbiHQa/27tw== Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 07:04:03 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: fuyuanli Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Introduce task_struct::latency_sensi_flag. Message-ID: <20240506070403.181b574d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240505030615.GA5131@didi-ThinkCentre-M920t-N000> References: <20240505030615.GA5131@didi-ThinkCentre-M920t-N000> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 5 May 2024 11:06:15 +0800 fuyuanli wrote: > A test has been made in two hosts named A and B. In A, several clients > sent udp packets to a single server in B concurrently as fast as > possible. In B, the IRQs of these flows were bound to CPU 0 by flow > director, so there was always a triggered net_rx softirq on CPU 0. Then > a test program was started in B, which was also bound to CPU 0, and > keeped calling sendto() in a loop. Sampling with perf, results showed > that about 25% of running time of test program was spent executing > local_bh_enable() contained in syscall sendto(), but after setting > latency_sensi_flag to 1, this proportion had been reduced to 0.5%. Enable threaded NAPI, it will have the same effect.