From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219D9C25B10 for ; Mon, 6 May 2024 20:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F2A3CDA30 for ; Mon, 6 May 2024 22:26:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B3D53C0831 for ; Mon, 6 May 2024 22:26:26 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-5.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90F2061123A for ; Mon, 6 May 2024 22:26:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CEF4227AC; Mon, 6 May 2024 20:26:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1715027184; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+Bv2u3rQYkyAGAb7aIdp43s4fcvhwokXJilAzcVOQIQ=; b=y8Ox1uIDzQkgvzYdrqvoAY9GEL/a+KIwjXectYfUQ0YrE80InZgmXu2toj+QiBTJNuoAak KfL092xwWN7PUVlN+7wOxL6oqufO8vnIAGWbWf1OYYO/mfn1Fnkm2yYki9nv5n3NQAe7oz j5GFs6Md0SH1fW6P+xRhheW9m1Xercs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1715027184; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+Bv2u3rQYkyAGAb7aIdp43s4fcvhwokXJilAzcVOQIQ=; b=rnBP/WrtMPtmAqfwvB9rFQN8vHT5YS6eCxEElVOQcCp3AvNyTFX0v4GGHvlXqMiFePDLYG jFJSTARoHir6RKDQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1715027184; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+Bv2u3rQYkyAGAb7aIdp43s4fcvhwokXJilAzcVOQIQ=; b=y8Ox1uIDzQkgvzYdrqvoAY9GEL/a+KIwjXectYfUQ0YrE80InZgmXu2toj+QiBTJNuoAak KfL092xwWN7PUVlN+7wOxL6oqufO8vnIAGWbWf1OYYO/mfn1Fnkm2yYki9nv5n3NQAe7oz j5GFs6Md0SH1fW6P+xRhheW9m1Xercs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1715027184; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+Bv2u3rQYkyAGAb7aIdp43s4fcvhwokXJilAzcVOQIQ=; b=rnBP/WrtMPtmAqfwvB9rFQN8vHT5YS6eCxEElVOQcCp3AvNyTFX0v4GGHvlXqMiFePDLYG jFJSTARoHir6RKDQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298C71386E; Mon, 6 May 2024 20:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id m1leCPA8OWYVYwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 06 May 2024 20:26:24 +0000 Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 22:26:14 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: <20240506202614.GC38981@pevik> References: <20240503081647.18253-1-andrea.cervesato@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v6] Refactor fork14 using new LTP API X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Andrea, Martin, > Hi, > Reviewed-by: Martin Doucha +1 ... Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > > + > > +static struct tst_test test = { > > + .test_all = run, > > + .setup = setup, > > + .cleanup = cleanup, > > + .forks_child = 1, > > + .skip_in_compat = 1, BTW test on x86 (i.e. true 64 bit) behaves exactly the same as on compat mode: tst_test.c:1614: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s fork14.c:46: TINFO: mmap() failed fork14.c:46: TINFO: mmap() failed fork14.c:46: TINFO: mmap() failed fork14.c:46: TINFO: mmap() failed fork14.c:46: TINFO: mmap() failed fork14.c:46: TINFO: mmap() failed fork14.c:46: TINFO: mmap() failed fork14.c:46: TINFO: mmap() failed fork14.c:46: TINFO: mmap() failed fork14.c:46: TINFO: mmap() failed fork14.c:46: TINFO: mmap() failed fork14.c:49: TCONF: mmap() fails too many times, so it's almost impossible to get a vm_area_struct sized 16TB. IMHO we should whitelist it as well, I can change before merge with diff below. (More elegant way would be to add .skip_in_32bit.) Kind regards, Petr +++ testcases/kernel/syscalls/fork/fork14.c @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ #include #include +#ifndef __i386__ + #define LARGE (16 * 1024) #define EXTENT (16 * 1024 + 10) @@ -121,3 +123,6 @@ static struct tst_test test = { {} } }; +#else +TST_TEST_TCONF("Not supported on x86 in 32-bit"); +#endif -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp