[PATCH bpf-next v4 9/9] selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_list_head arrays.

[Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>]

Make sure global arrays of bpf_list_heads and fields of bpf_list_heads in
nested struct types work correctly.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c    | 12 ++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c
index 2fb89de63bd2..77d07e0a4a55 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_list.c
@@ -183,6 +183,18 @@ static void test_linked_list_success(int mode, bool leave_in_map)
 	if (!leave_in_map)
 		clear_fields(skel->maps.bss_A);
 
+	ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.global_list_push_pop_nested), &opts);
+	ASSERT_OK(ret, "global_list_push_pop_nested");
+	ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "global_list_push_pop_nested retval");
+	if (!leave_in_map)
+		clear_fields(skel->maps.bss_A);
+
+	ret = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.global_list_array_push_pop), &opts);
+	ASSERT_OK(ret, "global_list_array_push_pop");
+	ASSERT_OK(opts.retval, "global_list_array_push_pop retval");
+	if (!leave_in_map)
+		clear_fields(skel->maps.bss_A);
+
 	if (mode == PUSH_POP)
 		goto end;
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list.c
index 26205ca80679..f69bf3e30321 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list.c
@@ -11,6 +11,22 @@
 
 #include "linked_list.h"
 
+struct head_nested_inner {
+	struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
+	struct bpf_list_head head __contains(foo, node2);
+};
+
+struct head_nested {
+	int dummy;
+	struct head_nested_inner inner;
+};
+
+private(C) struct bpf_spin_lock glock_c;
+private(C) struct bpf_list_head ghead_array[2] __contains(foo, node2);
+private(C) struct bpf_list_head ghead_array_one[1] __contains(foo, node2);
+
+private(D) struct head_nested ghead_nested;
+
 static __always_inline
 int list_push_pop(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock, struct bpf_list_head *head, bool leave_in_map)
 {
@@ -309,6 +325,32 @@ int global_list_push_pop(void *ctx)
 	return test_list_push_pop(&glock, &ghead);
 }
 
+SEC("tc")
+int global_list_push_pop_nested(void *ctx)
+{
+	return test_list_push_pop(&ghead_nested.inner.lock, &ghead_nested.inner.head);
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int global_list_array_push_pop(void *ctx)
+{
+	int r;
+
+	r = test_list_push_pop(&glock_c, &ghead_array[0]);
+	if (r)
+		return r;
+
+	r = test_list_push_pop(&glock_c, &ghead_array[1]);
+	if (r)
+		return r;
+
+	/* Arrays with only one element is a special case, being treated
+	 * just like a bpf_list_head variable by the verifier, not an
+	 * array.
+	 */
+	return test_list_push_pop(&glock_c, &ghead_array_one[0]);
+}
+
 SEC("tc")
 int map_list_push_pop_multiple(void *ctx)
 {
-- 
2.34.1