All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, brauner@kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: [PATCHES part 2 08/10] nilfs_attach_log_writer(): use ->bd_mapping->host instead of ->bd_inode
Date: Wed,  8 May 2024 07:44:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240508064452.3797817-8-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240508064452.3797817-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

I suspect that inode_attach_wb() use is rather unidiomatic, but
that's a separate story - in any case, its use is a few times
per mount *and* the route by which we access that inode is
"the host of address_space a page belongs to".

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
index aa5290cb7467..15188e799580 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -2790,7 +2790,7 @@ int nilfs_attach_log_writer(struct super_block *sb, struct nilfs_root *root)
 	if (!nilfs->ns_writer)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	inode_attach_wb(nilfs->ns_bdev->bd_inode, NULL);
+	inode_attach_wb(nilfs->ns_bdev->bd_mapping->host, NULL);
 
 	err = nilfs_segctor_start_thread(nilfs->ns_writer);
 	if (unlikely(err))
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-08  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-08  6:35 [PATCHES] ->bd_inode elimination Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:42 ` [PATCHES part 1 1/7] ext4: remove block_device_ejected() Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:42   ` [PATCHES part 1 2/7] bcachefs: remove dead function bdev_sectors() Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:42   ` [PATCHES part 1 3/7] blkdev_write_iter(): saner way to get inode and bdev Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:42   ` [PATCHES part 1 4/7] dm-vdo: use bdev_nr_bytes(bdev) instead of i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode) Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:42   ` [PATCHES part 1 5/7] block2mtd: prevent direct access of bd_inode Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:43   ` [PATCHES part 1 6/7] block: move two helpers into bdev.c Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:43   ` [PATCHES part 1 7/7] missing helpers: bdev_unhash(), bdev_drop() Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:44 ` [PATCHES part 2 01/10] block_device: add a pointer to struct address_space (page cache of bdev) Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:44   ` [PATCHES part 2 02/10] use ->bd_mapping instead of ->bd_inode->i_mapping Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:44   ` [PATCHES part 2 03/10] grow_dev_folio(): we only want ->bd_inode->i_mapping there Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:44   ` [PATCHES part 2 04/10] blk_ioctl_{discard,zeroout}(): we only want ->bd_inode->i_mapping here Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:44   ` [PATCHES part 2 05/10] fs/buffer.c: massage the remaining users of ->bd_inode to ->bd_mapping Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:44   ` [PATCHES part 2 06/10] gfs2: more obvious initializations of mapping->host Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:44   ` [PATCHES part 2 07/10] block/bdev.c: use the knowledge of inode/bdev coallocation Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:44   ` Al Viro [this message]
2024-05-08  6:44   ` [PATCHES part 2 09/10] dasd_format(): killing the last remaining user of ->bd_inode Al Viro
2024-05-08  6:44   ` [PATCHES part 2 10/10] RIP ->bd_inode Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240508064452.3797817-8-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.