From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/5] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 06:54:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240508065436.2f0c07e9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <955B77FD-C0C2-479E-9D85-D2F62E3DA48C@auristor.com>
On Wed, 8 May 2024 01:57:43 -0600 Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> > Looks like these got marked as Rejected in patchwork.
> > I think either because lore is confused and attaches an exchange with
> > DaveM from 2022 to them (?) or because I mentioned to DaveM that I'm
> > not sure these are fixes. So let me ask - on a scale of 1 to 10, how
> > convinced are you that these should go to Linus this week rather than
> > being categorized as general improvements and go during the merge
> > window (without the Fixes tags)?
>
> Jakub,
>
> In my opinion, the first two patches in the series I believe are important to back port to the stable branches.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com <mailto:jaltman@auristor.com>>
Are they regressions? Seems possible from the Fixes tag but unclear
from the text of the commit messages.
In any case, taking the first two may be a reasonable compromise.
Does it sounds good to you, David?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-08 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-03 15:07 [PATCH net 0/5] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2024-05-03 15:07 ` [PATCH net 1/5] rxrpc: Fix congestion control algorithm David Howells
2024-05-03 15:07 ` [PATCH net 2/5] rxrpc: Only transmit one ACK per jumbo packet received David Howells
2024-05-03 15:07 ` [PATCH net 3/5] rxrpc: Clean up Tx header flags generation handling David Howells
2024-05-03 15:07 ` [PATCH net 4/5] rxrpc: Change how the MORE-PACKETS rxrpc wire header flag is driven David Howells
2024-05-03 15:07 ` [PATCH net 5/5] rxrpc: Request an ACK on impending Tx stall David Howells
2024-05-08 2:44 ` [PATCH net 0/5] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-08 7:57 ` Jeffrey Altman
2024-05-08 13:54 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-05-08 14:00 ` David Howells
2024-05-08 15:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-08 15:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-19 15:01 David Howells
2025-07-16 11:52 David Howells
2022-05-21 8:02 David Howells
2022-05-22 20:32 ` David Miller
2022-05-22 20:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240508065436.2f0c07e9@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.