From: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>,
Jarred White <jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 5.15.y 1/3] Revert "Revert "ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses""
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 19:41:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240509194126.3020424-2-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240509194126.3020424-1-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
This reverts commit b54c4632946ae42f2b39ed38abd909bbf78cbcc2 which was a
revert of a backport of commit 2f4a4d63a193be6fd530d180bb13c3592052904c
upstream to 5.15.y.
Cc: Jarred White <jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
---
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index 7cc9183c8dc8e..408b1fda5702d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -161,6 +161,13 @@ show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_caps, cppc_perf_caps, nominal_freq);
show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_ctrs, cppc_perf_fb_ctrs, reference_perf);
show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_ctrs, cppc_perf_fb_ctrs, wraparound_time);
+/* Check for valid access_width, otherwise, fallback to using bit_width */
+#define GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg) ((reg)->access_width ? (8 << ((reg)->access_width - 1)) : (reg)->bit_width)
+
+/* Shift and apply the mask for CPC reads/writes */
+#define MASK_VAL(reg, val) ((val) >> ((reg)->bit_offset & \
+ GENMASK(((reg)->bit_width), 0)))
+
static ssize_t show_feedback_ctrs(struct kobject *kobj,
struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
@@ -762,8 +769,10 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr)
} else if (gas_t->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) {
if (gas_t->address) {
void __iomem *addr;
+ size_t access_width;
- addr = ioremap(gas_t->address, gas_t->bit_width/8);
+ access_width = GET_BIT_WIDTH(gas_t) / 8;
+ addr = ioremap(gas_t->address, access_width);
if (!addr)
goto out_free;
cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].sys_mem_vaddr = addr;
@@ -936,6 +945,7 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val)
{
int ret_val = 0;
void __iomem *vaddr = NULL;
+ int size;
int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpu);
struct cpc_reg *reg = ®_res->cpc_entry.reg;
@@ -955,7 +965,9 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val)
return acpi_os_read_memory((acpi_physical_address)reg->address,
val, reg->bit_width);
- switch (reg->bit_width) {
+ size = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg);
+
+ switch (size) {
case 8:
*val = readb_relaxed(vaddr);
break;
@@ -974,12 +986,16 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val)
ret_val = -EFAULT;
}
+ if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
+ *val = MASK_VAL(reg, *val);
+
return ret_val;
}
static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val)
{
int ret_val = 0;
+ int size;
void __iomem *vaddr = NULL;
int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpu);
struct cpc_reg *reg = ®_res->cpc_entry.reg;
@@ -994,7 +1010,12 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val)
return acpi_os_write_memory((acpi_physical_address)reg->address,
val, reg->bit_width);
- switch (reg->bit_width) {
+ size = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg);
+
+ if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
+ val = MASK_VAL(reg, val);
+
+ switch (size) {
case 8:
writeb_relaxed(val, vaddr);
break;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-09 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-09 19:41 [PATCH RESEND 5.15.y 0/3] Use access_width for _CPC package when provided by the platform firmware Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-09 19:41 ` Easwar Hariharan [this message]
2024-05-09 19:41 ` [PATCH RESEND 5.15.y 2/3] ACPI: CPPC: Fix bit_offset shift in MASK_VAL() macro Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-09 19:41 ` [PATCH RESEND 5.15.y 3/3] ACPI: CPPC: Fix access width used for PCC registers Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-11 13:25 ` [PATCH RESEND 5.15.y 0/3] Use access_width for _CPC package when provided by the platform firmware Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240509194126.3020424-2-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=eahariha@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jarredwhite@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vanshikonda@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.